F4i - Main Forum Main F4i discussion board

Gearing? 15/45 & hate it

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 23, 2012 | 09:42 PM
  #11  
RudyGT's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
From: northeast florida
Default

does anyone know when going smaller stops being efficient? such as, -2 in the front and -3 in the back for a total of +3 in the back, but with less rotational mass?
any con's to a smaller front sprocket?
in regards for racing im getting its a good idea to go smaller fronts, instead of larger rears, obviously for weight reasons and braking but also stability on turn ins because of that reduced rotational mass on the rear sprocket.
 
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2012 | 11:09 PM
  #12  
upgradedcbr's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Default

I like my stock gearing for now but will change it down the road as well.
 
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2012 | 01:51 PM
  #13  
Aken's Avatar
July 2008 ROTM
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,001
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee
Default

Worrying about rotational mass is kind of pointless unless you're racing competitively. You'll never see the benefits on the street. Consequently, doing less in the rear will partially/wholly negate going less in the front (depending how many teeth you drop on each side), so that's kind of silly.

-1 in the front is about the same as -3 or -3.5 in the rear. So if you want just a little bit of change without drastically affecting your RPMs or mileage, go +1 or +2 in the rear by itself. -1 in the front is then a little bit more drastic, then -1 +1, -1 +2, etc.

Keep in mind that for racing, they need to find a sweet spot between low end torque and high end speed. You won't find really crazy gear ratios on race bikes.

Also remember that depending on what type of gear ratio you select, and what you had before, you may need a different number of links in your chain.

And it's always a good rule of thumb to replace your chain and sprockets together as a set.
 

Last edited by gotcbr; Dec 24, 2012 at 01:55 PM. Reason: b2b
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2012 | 02:28 PM
  #14  
fiddy_nutz's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Aken

-1 in the front is about the same as -3 or -3.5 in the rear. So if you want just a little bit of change without drastically affecting your RPMs or mileage, go +1 or +2 in the rear by itself. -1 in the front is then a little bit more drastic, then -1 +1, -1 +2, etc.
-1 in the front is about the same as +2 or +3 in the rear. And if you go two small in the front it's not good on the chain. I run -1f and +3r with a 520 chain and it accelerates like an SOB and keeps up with GSXR750's up to about 90. It's on an f4 though. It sucks on the highway but I only ride that bike around town. I will probably go with that setup again.

And as far as that 15/45 setup that is only about a +1r over factory if stock was 16/46.
 
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2012 | 09:04 PM
  #15  
boredandstroked's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,244
Likes: 35
From: Mesa AZ
Default

Originally Posted by RudyGT
does anyone know when going smaller stops being efficient? such as, -2 in the front and -3 in the back for a total of +3 in the back, but with less rotational mass?
any con's to a smaller front sprocket?
in regards for racing im getting its a good idea to go smaller fronts, instead of larger rears, obviously for weight reasons and braking but also stability on turn ins because of that reduced rotational mass on the rear sprocket.
Going smaller on the front puts alot more stress on the sprocket teeth and isen't recommended past -1. As for rotational weight, racers don't care, it isen't enough to make any difference. They do care about how gearing can affect swingarm movment and will use it to their advantage. Of course thats ama+ level tuning, I doubt ricky racer at your local track takes that kind of stuff into consideration.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ajzcamaro
CBR 954RR
17
Dec 13, 2011 01:09 PM
fast1000f
CBR 1000F "Hurricane"
16
Sep 28, 2008 11:53 AM
900rr_Guy
CBR 900RR
0
Feb 4, 2007 07:08 PM
Junior
CBR 600F
10
Nov 6, 2006 06:35 PM
thesaint
CBR 929RR
0
Oct 29, 2006 11:18 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:18 AM.