CBR 600F2 1991 - 1994 CBR 600F2

Fuel issue

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 12, 2021 | 01:56 PM
  #11  
Sparky46's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 26
Likes: 5
Default

Ok came home put another couple of litres in and left the tank open, good charge on battery now , could see the fuel being sucked down, fired up after a bit of adjustments with the choke running sweet now thanks
 
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2021 | 02:28 PM
  #12  
hamlin6's Avatar
Super Moderator
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 7,177
Likes: 404
From: Alabama
Default

Very sweet. It sounds like your vacuum line is pinched or blocked.

 
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2021 | 04:41 PM
  #13  
Phil314's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 674
Likes: 53
From: 45.2521, -93.5612
Default

Sounds like you have it running now.

But just an FYI, F2's are gravity feed and should not have a filter after the petcock.
The fuel line should connect directly to the carbs.
The restriction of the filter can cause problems, especially at full throttle and such.
 
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2021 | 03:15 AM
  #14  
Sparky46's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 26
Likes: 5
Default

Originally Posted by Phil314
Sounds like you have it running now.

But just an FYI, F2's are gravity feed and should not have a filter after the petcock.
The fuel line should connect directly to the carbs.
The restriction of the filter can cause problems, especially at full throttle and such.
The Petcock does have a filter attached inside. Do you recommend I remove the inline filter then? It’s running lovely but I’ve not had it above 6k yet won’t be getting road tested probably until early next year.
 
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2021 | 06:06 AM
  #15  
Al1040's Avatar
Welcome crew
Joined: Jan 2021
Posts: 2,568
Likes: 426
From: Preston, UK
Default

As it is running well for now I would leave it, but bear in mind Phil314's comments in case it starts to struggle higher up the rev range.
 
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2021 | 07:34 AM
  #16  
Phil314's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 674
Likes: 53
From: 45.2521, -93.5612
Default

Originally Posted by Sparky46
The Petcock does have a filter attached inside. Do you recommend I remove the inline filter then? It’s running lovely but I’ve not had it above 6k yet won’t be getting road tested probably until early next year.
I ride a lot of miles and value a reliable bike that just works and never gives me a problem.
If it was me. I'd remove it. Gravity feed should never have a filter before the carbs.
I've seen more than a few people do this and it causes problems.
And it just isn't needed. It's not improving or helping in any way.
The filter in the tank above the petcock is all you need.
 
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2021 | 08:24 AM
  #17  
Sparky46's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 26
Likes: 5
Default

Fair enough thanks. I too just want a bike to work
 
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2021 | 09:29 AM
  #18  
Phil314's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 674
Likes: 53
From: 45.2521, -93.5612
Default

Originally Posted by Phil314
Gravity feed should never have a filter before the carbs.
I'll amend this statement slightly for knowledge sake.

Some gravity feed systems can use a small sintered bronze filter.
They offer zero restriction compared to paper filters and will work.
like this:
www.amazon.com/K-N-81-0221-Fuel-Filter/dp/B000E2AR70 www.amazon.com/K-N-81-0221-Fuel-Filter/dp/B000E2AR70


But in the case of the F2, still not needed, as it would be redundant to the filter already in the tank.


 

Last edited by Phil314; Dec 13, 2021 at 10:39 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
IAGator
CBR 1000F "Hurricane"
5
Apr 23, 2018 10:50 AM
Bigtex85
CBR 900RR
15
Jul 14, 2017 09:43 AM
williamsergio
CBR 600F2
7
Mar 19, 2009 09:54 AM
89cane
CBR 600F
7
Nov 8, 2007 07:18 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:48 AM.