Can someone explain this?
#31
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
#32
#34
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
ORIGINAL: vpsophmore
haha I just heard from a friend of mine who's a pilot that helicopters don't actually have the ability to fly their just so ugly the earth repels them
haha I just heard from a friend of mine who's a pilot that helicopters don't actually have the ability to fly their just so ugly the earth repels them
#35
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I hear what you guys are saying, but it just seems too implausible that the 'shutter speed' of a video camera could identically match the 'rotational frequency' of the rotor blades for more than a spit second. A computer monitor just sits there, not dynamic at all. Surely the helicopter's engine doesn't stay at exactly the same rpm's, especially during maneuvers?
Video editing seems more likely to me. It couldn't be that hard, take an image of still blades and graft it onto each frame of the moving helicopter. I mean, I don't know, what do all those movie fx guys do on their days off?
Video editing seems more likely to me. It couldn't be that hard, take an image of still blades and graft it onto each frame of the moving helicopter. I mean, I don't know, what do all those movie fx guys do on their days off?
#36
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
ORIGINAL: SpiritRR
I hear what you guys are saying, but it just seems too implausible that the 'shutter speed' of a video camera could identically match the 'rotational frequency' of the rotor blades for more than a spit second. A computer monitor just sits there, not dynamic at all. Surely the helicopter's engine doesn't stay at exactly the same rpm's, especially during maneuvers?
Video editing seems more likely to me. It couldn't be that hard, take an image of still blades and graft it onto each frame of the moving helicopter. I mean, I don't know, what do all those movie fx guys do on their days off?
I hear what you guys are saying, but it just seems too implausible that the 'shutter speed' of a video camera could identically match the 'rotational frequency' of the rotor blades for more than a spit second. A computer monitor just sits there, not dynamic at all. Surely the helicopter's engine doesn't stay at exactly the same rpm's, especially during maneuvers?
Video editing seems more likely to me. It couldn't be that hard, take an image of still blades and graft it onto each frame of the moving helicopter. I mean, I don't know, what do all those movie fx guys do on their days off?
By the way, the throttle is on the collective and operates like a motorcycle throttle, except it's the left hand.
And again, I used to have a video of me with my rotors almost stationary flying a UH1E (Huey). Taken with a Sony Handycam playing around with the shutter speed.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post