Bush vetoes child health insurance plan
#21
10-03-2007, 08:58 PM
Retired Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Fort Awesome
Posts: 7,524
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Bush vetoes child health insurance plan
I wonder if there has ever been a time when the rich didn't get richer and the poor didn't get poorer. The rich seem to always stay where they are at, and the poor and middle class change places. Think of all the great uprisings in our world's history. Have the poor ever made out for the better? I think the answer is NO. If we can't change history in thousands of years, we have little hope ofone president changing the world for the better...is your glass half full or half empty? Mine is half empty...
#22
10-03-2007, 09:11 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Bush vetoes child health insurance plan
ORIGINAL: outsider8
bush is about higher income families,what has he done for middle class families?-the cost of living keeps going up
and the rich keeps getting richer!!!!
ORIGINAL: Wildcat
"Poor kids first," Bush said later in explaining his decision, reflecting a concern that some of the bill's benefits would go to families at higher incomes. "Secondly, I believe in private medicine, not the federal government running the health care system," he added in remarks to an audience in Lancaster, Pa. The president said he is willing to compromise with Congress "if they need a little more money in the bill to help us meet the objective of getting help for poor children."
Sounds good to me.
They quote Pelosi, Reid, Biden, and Dean for comments. I know it's a rotten bill if they're for it.
When will Kennedy, Kerry, and Clinton chime in and give us their "wisdom?"
Btw, aren't hot-button political issues something we should stay away from here?
"Poor kids first," Bush said later in explaining his decision, reflecting a concern that some of the bill's benefits would go to families at higher incomes. "Secondly, I believe in private medicine, not the federal government running the health care system," he added in remarks to an audience in Lancaster, Pa. The president said he is willing to compromise with Congress "if they need a little more money in the bill to help us meet the objective of getting help for poor children."
Sounds good to me.
They quote Pelosi, Reid, Biden, and Dean for comments. I know it's a rotten bill if they're for it.
When will Kennedy, Kerry, and Clinton chime in and give us their "wisdom?"
Btw, aren't hot-button political issues something we should stay away from here?
and the rich keeps getting richer!!!!
It'll always be like that.
#23
10-03-2007, 09:16 PM
RE: Bush vetoes child health insurance plan
ORIGINAL: outsider8
bush is about higher income families,what has he done for middle class families?-the cost of living keeps going up
and the rich keeps getting richer!!!!
ORIGINAL: Wildcat
"Poor kids first," Bush said later in explaining his decision, reflecting a concern that some of the bill's benefits would go to families at higher incomes. "Secondly, I believe in private medicine, not the federal government running the health care system," he added in remarks to an audience in Lancaster, Pa. The president said he is willing to compromise with Congress "if they need a little more money in the bill to help us meet the objective of getting help for poor children."
Sounds good to me.
They quote Pelosi, Reid, Biden, and Dean for comments. I know it's a rotten bill if they're for it.
When will Kennedy, Kerry, and Clinton chime in and give us their "wisdom?"
Btw, aren't hot-button political issues something we should stay away from here?
"Poor kids first," Bush said later in explaining his decision, reflecting a concern that some of the bill's benefits would go to families at higher incomes. "Secondly, I believe in private medicine, not the federal government running the health care system," he added in remarks to an audience in Lancaster, Pa. The president said he is willing to compromise with Congress "if they need a little more money in the bill to help us meet the objective of getting help for poor children."
Sounds good to me.
They quote Pelosi, Reid, Biden, and Dean for comments. I know it's a rotten bill if they're for it.
When will Kennedy, Kerry, and Clinton chime in and give us their "wisdom?"
Btw, aren't hot-button political issues something we should stay away from here?
and the rich keeps getting richer!!!!
#24
10-03-2007, 09:17 PM
#25
10-03-2007, 09:38 PM
RE: Bush vetoes child health insurance plan
ORIGINAL: voodoochyl
I wonder if there has ever been a time when the rich didn't get richer and the poor didn't get poorer. The rich seem to always stay where they are at, and the poor and middle class change places. Think of all the great uprisings in our world's history. Have the poor ever made out for the better? I think the answer is NO. If we can't change history in thousands of years, we have little hope ofone president changing the world for the better...is your glass half full or half empty? Mine is half empty...
I wonder if there has ever been a time when the rich didn't get richer and the poor didn't get poorer. The rich seem to always stay where they are at, and the poor and middle class change places. Think of all the great uprisings in our world's history. Have the poor ever made out for the better? I think the answer is NO. If we can't change history in thousands of years, we have little hope ofone president changing the world for the better...is your glass half full or half empty? Mine is half empty...
what are the rich going to do once there is no one left to buy??-or lie to!!
#26
10-03-2007, 10:27 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location:
Posts: 964
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
]
#27
10-04-2007, 01:32 AM
Friend and Hero ...
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Worldwide not a joke
Posts: 1,596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Bush vetoes child health insurance plan
I am often shocked by the fact that we are one of the only true civilized nations in the world that does not have a government run health care system understand the deregulation of airlines, Telephone companies, and etc. etc. but this is one thing that the government should regulate IF it not going to provide the services themselves I watched an interview with a British doctor who said that the reason that so many doctors practicing in other countries move to the United States is they can't make the kind of money anywhere else that they can here in the United States. I am absolutely all for capitalism and free trade and the right for a individual to earn a living. But should we as a whole suffer. I don't think that's what our forefathers intended
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
