Bush vetoes child health insurance plan
#1
10-03-2007 | 01:44 PM
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,099
Likes: 0
Bush vetoes child health insurance plan
Never has it been clearer how detached President Bush is from the priorities of the American people
#3
10-03-2007 | 01:48 PM
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
From:
RE: Bush vetoes child health insurance plan
Those plans sound so great, they just aren't practical. If he had let it go through, then you would knock him for spending too much government money on a very expensive program. And no I am not a Bush fan, so don't say that, I just support the decision.
#4
10-03-2007 | 01:49 PM
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,844
Likes: 1
From: South Texas
RE: Bush vetoes child health insurance plan
ORIGINAL: jaghunter
Those plans sound so great, they just aren't practical. If he had let it go through, then you would knock him for spending too much government money on a very expensive program. And no I am not a Bush fan, so don't say that, I just support the decision.
Those plans sound so great, they just aren't practical. If he had let it go through, then you would knock him for spending too much government money on a very expensive program. And no I am not a Bush fan, so don't say that, I just support the decision.
#5
10-03-2007 | 01:51 PM
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,099
Likes: 0
RE: Bush vetoes child health insurance plan
ORIGINAL: rrasco
I guess $800 Billion on bombs was a better investment.
ORIGINAL: jaghunter
Those plans sound so great, they just aren't practical. If he had let it go through, then you would knock him for spending too much government money on a very expensive program. And no I am not a Bush fan, so don't say that, I just support the decision.
Those plans sound so great, they just aren't practical. If he had let it go through, then you would knock him for spending too much government money on a very expensive program. And no I am not a Bush fan, so don't say that, I just support the decision.
#8
10-03-2007 | 03:41 PM
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
From:
RE: Bush vetoes child health insurance plan
ORIGINAL: rrasco
I guess $800 Billion on bombs was a better investment.
ORIGINAL: jaghunter
Those plans sound so great, they just aren't practical. If he had let it go through, then you would knock him for spending too much government money on a very expensive program. And no I am not a Bush fan, so don't say that, I just support the decision.
Those plans sound so great, they just aren't practical. If he had let it go through, then you would knock him for spending too much government money on a very expensive program. And no I am not a Bush fan, so don't say that, I just support the decision.
#9
10-03-2007 | 03:59 PM
Senior Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
From: Central Virginia
RE: Bush vetoes child health insurance plan
I'm reading now that they're claiming that ther was some sort of "smoke & mirrors" method for funding of this. If that's true, then it could be understandable and fixed and re-submitted. If it's not, then I think there is definitely a problem with priorities going on here.
I would much rather see a smoke and mirror funded childrens' health insurance program than some of the BS amnesty ideas he's come up with for illegal immigrants. Of course, there's the war that we would all like to see ended. But, throwing people and money at problems seems to be company and government ways of doing things. I think that good strategy, priority and efficiency would be better motives for methods.
I would much rather see a smoke and mirror funded childrens' health insurance program than some of the BS amnesty ideas he's come up with for illegal immigrants. Of course, there's the war that we would all like to see ended. But, throwing people and money at problems seems to be company and government ways of doing things. I think that good strategy, priority and efficiency would be better motives for methods.
