Bush vetoes child health insurance plan
#1
10-03-2007, 01:44 PM
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,099
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bush vetoes child health insurance plan
Never has it been clearer how detached President Bush is from the priorities of the American people
#3
10-03-2007, 01:48 PM
RE: Bush vetoes child health insurance plan
Those plans sound so great, they just aren't practical. If he had let it go through, then you would knock him for spending too much government money on a very expensive program. And no I am not a Bush fan, so don't say that, I just support the decision.
#4
10-03-2007, 01:49 PM
RE: Bush vetoes child health insurance plan
ORIGINAL: jaghunter
Those plans sound so great, they just aren't practical. If he had let it go through, then you would knock him for spending too much government money on a very expensive program. And no I am not a Bush fan, so don't say that, I just support the decision.
Those plans sound so great, they just aren't practical. If he had let it go through, then you would knock him for spending too much government money on a very expensive program. And no I am not a Bush fan, so don't say that, I just support the decision.
#5
10-03-2007, 01:51 PM
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,099
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Bush vetoes child health insurance plan
ORIGINAL: rrasco
I guess $800 Billion on bombs was a better investment.
ORIGINAL: jaghunter
Those plans sound so great, they just aren't practical. If he had let it go through, then you would knock him for spending too much government money on a very expensive program. And no I am not a Bush fan, so don't say that, I just support the decision.
Those plans sound so great, they just aren't practical. If he had let it go through, then you would knock him for spending too much government money on a very expensive program. And no I am not a Bush fan, so don't say that, I just support the decision.
#7
10-03-2007, 03:06 PM
#8
10-03-2007, 03:41 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location:
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Bush vetoes child health insurance plan
ORIGINAL: rrasco
I guess $800 Billion on bombs was a better investment.
ORIGINAL: jaghunter
Those plans sound so great, they just aren't practical. If he had let it go through, then you would knock him for spending too much government money on a very expensive program. And no I am not a Bush fan, so don't say that, I just support the decision.
Those plans sound so great, they just aren't practical. If he had let it go through, then you would knock him for spending too much government money on a very expensive program. And no I am not a Bush fan, so don't say that, I just support the decision.
#9
10-03-2007, 03:59 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Central Virginia
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Bush vetoes child health insurance plan
I'm reading now that they're claiming that ther was some sort of "smoke & mirrors" method for funding of this. If that's true, then it could be understandable and fixed and re-submitted. If it's not, then I think there is definitely a problem with priorities going on here.
I would much rather see a smoke and mirror funded childrens' health insurance program than some of the BS amnesty ideas he's come up with for illegal immigrants. Of course, there's the war that we would all like to see ended. But, throwing people and money at problems seems to be company and government ways of doing things. I think that good strategy, priority and efficiency would be better motives for methods.
I would much rather see a smoke and mirror funded childrens' health insurance program than some of the BS amnesty ideas he's come up with for illegal immigrants. Of course, there's the war that we would all like to see ended. But, throwing people and money at problems seems to be company and government ways of doing things. I think that good strategy, priority and efficiency would be better motives for methods.
