180 vs 190 rear
Hi all,
I just noticed that the 954 I bought a month ago has a 180 rear as opposed to the 190 recommended by the manual. Tyre is still healthy (Bridgestone 002) so I'm not thinking to replace it just now. Just wondering though if a 190 section suits it better. True or false?
Next tyre will be the BT 016 tripple compound by the looks of what i have read so far.
Also I have read in various posts here about the chain mod (to a 520 I think) , but I couldnt find any info on the reason for such a mod. So...Why???
agis
I just noticed that the 954 I bought a month ago has a 180 rear as opposed to the 190 recommended by the manual. Tyre is still healthy (Bridgestone 002) so I'm not thinking to replace it just now. Just wondering though if a 190 section suits it better. True or false?
Next tyre will be the BT 016 tripple compound by the looks of what i have read so far.
Also I have read in various posts here about the chain mod (to a 520 I think) , but I couldnt find any info on the reason for such a mod. So...Why???
agis
Either tire will work just fine, a lot of people go to the 180 tire for a little better turn in, ie: leans over easier. As far as the 520 chain conversion, its a lighter, thinner chain, so it has a little less rotating mass. In theory it should free up a little bit of hp, but not so much you will probably notice, it also of course a bit lighter also.
Im riding a 180 tire and a 520 chain conversion. Personally i think i liked my 190 better but it could just be that im still getting used to riding twisties. didint notice any change from the chain, cept it looks really small. i actually like the stock chain better too just for looks
But thats just IMO. Take it as you will.
But thats just IMO. Take it as you will.
i have the 520 with a 180 rear tire as well. it turns-in really sweet at almost any speed. i have not tried the 190 and never had the stock chain on this bike so i can't tell you for sure.
going from the 530 to the 520 chain on my 600 definitely helped though, also bumping the rear sprocket up a couple teeth helps with acceleration / wheelies, if you're into that. Of course on the flip-side it can be more dangerous and make the front end get light and twitchy a bit easier.
locally i hear the Pirelli Corsa's are the best for grip, along with Michelin Pilot Powers. I have the Dunlop Qualifiers on mine, but i only push it so hard. I haven't heard anything about Bridgestone's for this particular bike.
going from the 530 to the 520 chain on my 600 definitely helped though, also bumping the rear sprocket up a couple teeth helps with acceleration / wheelies, if you're into that. Of course on the flip-side it can be more dangerous and make the front end get light and twitchy a bit easier.
locally i hear the Pirelli Corsa's are the best for grip, along with Michelin Pilot Powers. I have the Dunlop Qualifiers on mine, but i only push it so hard. I haven't heard anything about Bridgestone's for this particular bike.
ORIGINAL: NY Erion929
There is a 3rd option. You can now get a 190/55 instead of the standard 190/50 which will give you the better turn-in (as the 180) and keep the 190 width
There is a 3rd option. You can now get a 190/55 instead of the standard 190/50 which will give you the better turn-in (as the 180) and keep the 190 width
^ you can definatly do a search on that one, the tire thing has been beaten to death around here
. The answers you will find commonly though are Michelin pilot power 2ct, and Pirelli Diablo 2s. I will also still stand behind my Metzeler m3s, imo same as the first 2 but a bit cheaper. Any of the 3 you cant go wrong though.
. The answers you will find commonly though are Michelin pilot power 2ct, and Pirelli Diablo 2s. I will also still stand behind my Metzeler m3s, imo same as the first 2 but a bit cheaper. Any of the 3 you cant go wrong though.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
romanboy
F4i - Main Forum
5
Jan 6, 2013 07:57 PM
berga
F2 Tech
9
Mar 25, 2010 09:11 PM




