Anyone raced their RR Vs F4i?
#71
#74
RE: Anyone raced their RR Vs F4i?
the F4i is hondas entry level bike, it has less power, but different gearing.. which is why it keeps up with the RR, but in the top end, after about mid 3rd gear, the RR pulls away... but ill give it to the f4i, itll take down a RR with a rookie rider on it..
#75
RE: Anyone raced their RR Vs F4i?
I have to say i agree with woody on this one it's seems simple to me the way that he explained it, as a matter of fact i can't even believe that this topic was ever up for debate, they are not the same engine! And i think people need to take the time and actually read these posts all the way through and try to understand what is being said before getting all hot and posting some pissy response!
#76
#77
RE: Anyone raced their RR Vs F4i?
ORIGINAL: dwhite645
That is wrong on so many levels. An F4i, being a supersport, is certainly not an entry level bike. I think the rebel is their entry level bike. Big difference.
ORIGINAL: TribalRR916
the F4i is hondas entry level bike
the F4i is hondas entry level bike
#78
#79
RE: Anyone raced their RR Vs F4i?
online arguing is like running in the special olympics. it doesn't matter who wins or loses, everyone is still retarded.
the answer to the original question: the RR is faster. all variables aside, power to weight ratio decides that. but modify the bike and all bets are off. the most important factor is still rider ability. a good rider will outride a newbie, regardless of bike choice.
and onto my views on the "same engine" debate. i have no technical or insider info on whether they are the same or not. but if they were, wouldn't you see a bunch of f4i's running around with the advanced FI from the RR (and whatever other little differences that separate them) and putting out the same performance numbers? i've never heard of anyone doing this. so i will assume that they are different.
the answer to the original question: the RR is faster. all variables aside, power to weight ratio decides that. but modify the bike and all bets are off. the most important factor is still rider ability. a good rider will outride a newbie, regardless of bike choice.
and onto my views on the "same engine" debate. i have no technical or insider info on whether they are the same or not. but if they were, wouldn't you see a bunch of f4i's running around with the advanced FI from the RR (and whatever other little differences that separate them) and putting out the same performance numbers? i've never heard of anyone doing this. so i will assume that they are different.
#80
RE: Anyone raced their RR Vs F4i?
ORIGINAL: Fretless33
Ladies and gentlemen...CAPTAIN UNBEATABLE!!!
ORIGINAL: DThompson
Infact i dont know anyone around here that is going to rocket away from me with a stock F4i or RR. If I dont win the race than my engine must have blown up.
Infact i dont know anyone around here that is going to rocket away from me with a stock F4i or RR. If I dont win the race than my engine must have blown up.
I just think its funny because some of the people on here act like the RR has like 700 horsepower and the F4i has like 10 horsepower. As if the RR is going to Rocket away like a jet or something, leaving me like I was setting still.