CBR 1000F "Hurricane" 1987-1996 CBR 1000F

What have you done to your CBR 1000f today?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1521  
Old 04-24-2012, 09:14 PM
Sprock's Avatar
Administrator, MVN / ROTM NOV 2012
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Republic of Boon Island
Posts: 11,004
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Yep it sure is stock 3 1/2 inch

Has a michelin pilot "race" 170 55 17 on it ...... seems really old too

The 55 aspect ratio makes it have shorter sidewalls I'm guessing - interesting !

most current day 170's are a 60 & 180's are a 55

Buying Shinko Verge 011 tires for it in 120 70 17 & 170 60 17 ($215) / set

and another Verge set with a 180 rear for my 93.

My neighbor just grabbed a Verge set for his "new" 1000F (see saloon)
at same ($215) deal
 

Last edited by Sprock; 04-24-2012 at 09:22 PM.
  #1522  
Old 04-24-2012, 10:29 PM
robbiebgraham's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Waitahanui, New Zealand
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Does the shape look OK on the 3 1/2 rim?
 
  #1523  
Old 04-24-2012, 11:37 PM
Shadow's Avatar
Redcoat, & Maxwell's Silver Hammer, MVN and curmudgeon
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Mud hut, Zululand
Posts: 11,608
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Why do you say the upper fairing is flimsy, Sprock ?
Maybe without the screen and support frame, or is there damage ?

Isn't the 170 too wide for that rim ?
The 170 is the std tyre for the 89/90 onward bike, I think the 87 was a 150..............????
 
  #1524  
Old 04-25-2012, 12:01 AM
robbiebgraham's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Waitahanui, New Zealand
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Standard is 140 for an 87, that's why I asked if the shape looked OK. Seems to me that I would be squeezed in quite a bit. Could you measure the width while it's on the rim for us Sprock?
 
  #1525  
Old 04-25-2012, 12:13 AM
Shadow's Avatar
Redcoat, & Maxwell's Silver Hammer, MVN and curmudgeon
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Mud hut, Zululand
Posts: 11,608
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

A 170 on an 87 rim would be a DANGEROUS choice Sprock.
It'll be unstable and plain unsafe at any speed................
on that rim

Be a bit like fitting a Nascar tyre to a tricycle. Too much wall movement, heat build-up and that's assuming it'll go in with no clearance issues, although I suspect it will. The bike handling won't be good atall atall.

Go for the 150 MAX width.
 
  #1526  
Old 04-25-2012, 05:09 AM
Sprock's Avatar
Administrator, MVN / ROTM NOV 2012
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Republic of Boon Island
Posts: 11,004
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Hmmmm as I said it's a weird sized 170 - 55 on it - short sidewalls

I'll measure it tonight robbie !

Yeah Pete the left ear up by the screen was broken , when I took it
off a lousy fiberglass repair was in behind it. Carefully pulled it apart
and will repair correctly with two light steel / rods and JBweld
it will never break there again. Also below the headlight has cracks
and will get the same treatment which as always worked well for me
- strong and very light - basically welding rods with the flux taken off
and JBWelded in behind - stronger than all hell !

But in general the whole upper 87 cowl is much lighter and more flimsy
than a 90 or 93 - guage of plastic is much much thinner - which imo
is why they crack and break up so much - that and the way the mount
points are setup and the fact the weight of the headlamp unit and
windshield are totally supported "only" by the cowling - all contributing
factors for degradation and cracks over time - even the mid fairing hangs
off the front of it adding more stress !

Bad design - better on later models
 

Last edited by Sprock; 04-25-2012 at 06:10 AM.
  #1527  
Old 04-25-2012, 08:57 AM
pmcg's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Sparta, NJ, USA
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by robbiebgraham
Does the shape look OK on the 3 1/2 rim?
I had a 160 on my 87 rim and the shape looked terrible. I ended up going with a 150 and in my non expert opinion thats the biggest you can go if planning on turning aggressively.

Heres the 160 you can see theres no shoulder

[IMG][/IMG]
 
  #1528  
Old 04-25-2012, 03:09 PM
robbiebgraham's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Waitahanui, New Zealand
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Hi pmcg, I didn't think you could get a radial in 150, so what did you put on?
 
  #1529  
Old 04-25-2012, 03:31 PM
pmcg's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Sparta, NJ, USA
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I went with a Michelin pilot power in 150 60 17
 
  #1530  
Old 04-25-2012, 04:28 PM
Sprock's Avatar
Administrator, MVN / ROTM NOV 2012
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Republic of Boon Island
Posts: 11,004
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Ya know I always like to listen to you Guys no seriously

So I'm considering these in a 150 and they're good value

that would be the set for 190 bucks
 

Last edited by Sprock; 04-25-2012 at 04:32 PM.


Quick Reply: What have you done to your CBR 1000f today?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:03 AM.