Vfr1200
#1
Vfr1200
I got my issue of Motorcyclist in the mail today and they had computer renderings and spy shots of a replacement for the VFR800
http://www.motorcyclistonline.com/ne...200/index.html
not mentioned on that page from the issue are a few engine details
1. cylinder layout is not standard V4, the 2 front cylinders and the bookends for the crank
(from left to right it is: Front, Rear, Rear, Front) instead of alternating as is usual
this is done to make the bike narrower at its midsection closest to the rider
2. as part of the variable displacement technology, the front cylinders will use a sohc with tappets (from the CRF450R) and the rear will use DOHC with VTEC and will be the cylinders that are cut out.
I can't wait to see one of these in person
http://www.motorcyclistonline.com/ne...200/index.html
not mentioned on that page from the issue are a few engine details
1. cylinder layout is not standard V4, the 2 front cylinders and the bookends for the crank
(from left to right it is: Front, Rear, Rear, Front) instead of alternating as is usual
this is done to make the bike narrower at its midsection closest to the rider
2. as part of the variable displacement technology, the front cylinders will use a sohc with tappets (from the CRF450R) and the rear will use DOHC with VTEC and will be the cylinders that are cut out.
I can't wait to see one of these in person
#2
I saw some spy shots of it also. The only thing that gets me is it has a shaft drive. It will be heavy when compared to the VFR800. I don't know about cylinder deactivation. I was on the R & D end of the GM deactivation projects and all I will say about that is I will NEVER own one of those vehicles.
#4
The spy bike looks pretty mean. Less Starship Trooper Insect and more Darth Vader.
#5
#6
#7
what's up with the guy in the spy shots with only boots gloves and a helmet on? No jacket, no riding pants, no race suit, on a "prototype" none the less.
As for the bike, I think it looks pretty good, the engine sounds awesome, but more complicated then it really needs to be. I think the cylinder deactivation is a little much, I mean come on we are on bikes, it's not like we only get 15 mpg. That and I live in a hilly mountain area so my bike is almost always under load. As for the shaft drive, I like the idea for the sport touring aspect for the fact it's almost maintenance free. I like my v4 shaft drive ride when it's not breaking because it's old, but what is the price of this bike going to be? Hopefully it will be sub 15k and closer to 10k.
As for the bike, I think it looks pretty good, the engine sounds awesome, but more complicated then it really needs to be. I think the cylinder deactivation is a little much, I mean come on we are on bikes, it's not like we only get 15 mpg. That and I live in a hilly mountain area so my bike is almost always under load. As for the shaft drive, I like the idea for the sport touring aspect for the fact it's almost maintenance free. I like my v4 shaft drive ride when it's not breaking because it's old, but what is the price of this bike going to be? Hopefully it will be sub 15k and closer to 10k.
#8
what's up with the guy in the spy shots with only boots gloves and a helmet on? No jacket, no riding pants, no race suit, on a "prototype" none the less.
As for the bike, I think it looks pretty good, the engine sounds awesome, but more complicated then it really needs to be. I think the cylinder deactivation is a little much, I mean come on we are on bikes, it's not like we only get 15 mpg.
As for the bike, I think it looks pretty good, the engine sounds awesome, but more complicated then it really needs to be. I think the cylinder deactivation is a little much, I mean come on we are on bikes, it's not like we only get 15 mpg.
And I agree on the engine complexity angle. The simplest way to control your mileage is with your throttle hand.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post