Off Topic A place for you CBR junkies to boldly go off topic. Almost anything goes.

physics exam

Old Apr 4, 2008 | 04:07 AM
  #21  
eweppley's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,592
Likes: 0
From: Central PA, USA
Default RE: physics exam

Pysics 202 and Thermo were both bitches for me. If I can't see or touch something, I have a hard time visualizing it. I'm still that way. God Bless the curve!!!!
 
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2008 | 06:13 AM
  #22  
fishfryer527's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,837
Likes: 0
From: Indian Harbor Beach, Florid
Default RE: physics exam

I got a 17% on a 'controls' class during my undergrad in chemical eng...it was a B. You should be proud of a 55%.
 
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2008 | 08:06 AM
  #23  
RCR's Avatar
RCR
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,131
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: physics exam

I can ride a bike with no handle bars, no handle bars, no handle bars......






 
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2008 | 09:02 AM
  #24  
Xx New Guy xX's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
Default RE: physics exam

all this does is remind me of how happy i am to not do those ridiculous questions and get those ridiculous grades ever again!

my shining (academic) moment in college was getting a 120/100 on a Calc 2 test, the average was about a 70. I rocked that jaunk! If I were to take that test today, I'd be happy with a 40%

I was the perfect example of "learn how to do the stuff the day before the test, take the test, and forget the rest!" hahahahaha - only for the classes I didn't like though, I actually studied pretty hard and learned quite a bit about the subjects that interested me (information management, comp sci & business integration, SOX compliancy, etc)

+1 for computer science, I'll let the processer figure out the problems for me ;-)
 
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2008 | 09:15 AM
  #25  
Nauree's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,099
Likes: 0
Default RE: physics exam

On my last Physics test I got a 99%. The average score was 58%. We started out with around 70 people we're down to 30. I r got a 90+% A in the class WITHOUT a curve
 
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2008 | 10:41 AM
  #26  
therabbit's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: physics exam

ORIGINAL: Nauree

Ok this is a beast homework problem.

A crate of mass m1 on a frictionless inclined plane is attached to another crate of mass m2 by a massless rope. The rope passes over an ideal pulley so the mass m2 is suspended in air. The plane is inclined at an angle = 36.9°. Use conservation of energy to find how fast crate m2 is moving after m1 has traveled a distance of 1.4 m along the incline, starting from rest. The mass of m1 is 10.2 kg and the mass of m2 is 18.4 kg.

I'm trying to figure out what types of energy each have. I believe m2 only have gravitional potential energy but I'm unsure of what if m1 has kinetic energy. I know they both have to have grav potential. Right now I've concluded that that the Work for m2 = Work for m1.

I'm sitting here in the dark, infront of my computer, with my cal, playing rock and metal. Extreme Physics!

You're making it way too hard. It's a basic conversion from potential energy to kinetic energy.
M2 moves 1.4m closer to the ground, M1 moves 1.4m*sin(36.9°) away from the ground.
Change in potential energy= m*g*delta h
m2 change = 18.4kg * 9.81 m/s/s * 1.4m = 252.7J
m1 change = 10.2kg * 9.81 m/s/s * -0.841m = -84.2J

Now thatenergy (252.7J - 84.2J)has been converted from potential tokinetic energy. Kinetic energy is 1/2 m*v^2 so...
252.7-84.2 = 168.6 (total energy that is now kinetic)
168.6J=.5*(18.4+10.2)*v^2 (the two masses are tied together with the massless rope, they act as one object because one of them can't be moving faster then the other)
v^2=11.8
v=3.4 m/s

To prove this to yourself you can do it the old fashioned way, find the acceleration of m2, find the time it would take for it to move 1.4m, find speed at 1.4m. This is basically just an exercise in showing you that conservation of energy problems can save you a lot of work from doing a problem a different way.
 
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2008 | 11:12 AM
  #27  
Nauree's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,099
Likes: 0
Default RE: physics exam

ORIGINAL: therabbit

ORIGINAL: Nauree

Ok this is a beast homework problem.

A crate of mass m1 on a frictionless inclined plane is attached to another crate of mass m2 by a massless rope. The rope passes over an ideal pulley so the mass m2 is suspended in air. The plane is inclined at an angle = 36.9°. Use conservation of energy to find how fast crate m2 is moving after m1 has traveled a distance of 1.4 m along the incline, starting from rest. The mass of m1 is 10.2 kg and the mass of m2 is 18.4 kg.

I'm trying to figure out what types of energy each have. I believe m2 only have gravitional potential energy but I'm unsure of what if m1 has kinetic energy. I know they both have to have grav potential. Right now I've concluded that that the Work for m2 = Work for m1.

I'm sitting here in the dark, infront of my computer, with my cal, playing rock and metal. Extreme Physics!

You're making it way too hard. It's a basic conversion from potential energy to kinetic energy.
M2 moves 1.4m closer to the ground, M1 moves 1.4m*sin(36.9°) away from the ground.
Change in potential energy= m*g*delta h
m2 change = 18.4kg * 9.81 m/s/s * 1.4m = 252.7J
m1 change = 10.2kg * 9.81 m/s/s * -0.841m = -84.2J

Now thatenergy (252.7J - 84.2J)has been converted from potential tokinetic energy. Kinetic energy is 1/2 m*v^2 so...
252.7-84.2 = 168.6 (total energy that is now kinetic)
168.6J=.5*(18.4+10.2)*v^2 (the two masses are tied together with the massless rope, they act as one object because one of them can't be moving faster then the other)
v^2=11.8
v=3.4 m/s

To prove this to yourself you can do it the old fashioned way, find the acceleration of m2, find the time it would take for it to move 1.4m, find speed at 1.4m. This is basically just an exercise in showing you that conservation of energy problems can save you a lot of work from doing a problem a different way.
What would the entire conservation equal be? Our prof is making is put every type of energy associated even if they come out to 0.

Like would

E1 = E2
U1 + K1 = U1 + K2
How would each equation cancle out to only be left with just Kinetic energy.
 
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2008 | 11:15 AM
  #28  
specializedfuji's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: physics exam

dear god we got a lot of nerds on this forum. haha [sm=roll.gif]

im probably one of them too!!
 
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2008 | 03:04 PM
  #29  
therabbit's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: physics exam

ORIGINAL: Nauree
What would the entire conservation equal be? Our prof is making is put every type of energy associated even if they come out to 0.

Like would

E1 = E2
U1 + K1 = U1 + K2
How would each equation cancle out to only be left with just Kinetic energy.
Total conservation would be
(U1,1) + (U1,2) + (K1,1) + (K1,2) = (U2,1) + (U2,2) + (K2,1) + (K2,2)
Total energy at the start equals the total energy at the end
K1,1 and K1,2 are both 0 because at the start everything is stationary, and you don't know what any of the potential energies are, you only know the differences.
So rewrite the equation like this:
[(U1,1)-(U2,1)] + [(U1,2)-(U2,2)] = [(K2,1)+(K2,2)]
[18.4kg * 9.81 m/s/s * 1.4m] + [10.2kg * 9.81 m/s/s * -0.841m] = [0.5*(18.4+10.2)*3.4^2]
[252] + [-84] = [168]
[168]=[168]
Thus, energy is conserved. Tada!
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rocketsauce035
Off Topic
5
Nov 20, 2009 01:10 AM
CBR Jockey
Off Topic
7
Jun 11, 2008 07:20 PM
MikeZ
Off Topic
8
Apr 25, 2008 08:29 PM
EPNF4i
Sights 'N Sounds
10
Sep 30, 2007 11:00 PM
telgren
Off Topic
15
Feb 2, 2007 09:58 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:11 PM.