Is Bonds Guilty?
I am pro-steroids. As long as the game is more interesting I am all for it. It is not my problem if the athletes have health problems later on. The way I see it if cigarettes are legal and they are definitely toxic, why shouldn't steroids be legal for everybody. The government allows Frank Purdue to roid up his chickens and pass that on to us, why don't we just bypass the chicken and do shots of d-bol. Really, what is the big deal??
ORIGINAL: fishfryer527
I am pro-steroids. As long as the game is more interesting I am all for it. It is not my problem if the athletes have health problems later on. The way I see it if cigarettes are legal and they are definitely toxic, why shouldn't steroids be legal for everybody. The government allows Frank Purdue to roid up his chickens and pass that on to us, why don't we just bypass the chicken and do shots of d-bol. Really, what is the big deal??
I am pro-steroids. As long as the game is more interesting I am all for it. It is not my problem if the athletes have health problems later on. The way I see it if cigarettes are legal and they are definitely toxic, why shouldn't steroids be legal for everybody. The government allows Frank Purdue to roid up his chickens and pass that on to us, why don't we just bypass the chicken and do shots of d-bol. Really, what is the big deal??

Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



