3dmark06 score challenge
#1
03-22-2008, 12:35 AM
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
3dmark06 score challenge
Alright PC nerds. Lets see those pc nuts. I'll show mine first. O and dont worry I'm not done yet.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XkCvZ_qRVk
*Edit*
Make sure to run it on stock settings.
res: 1280x1024
anti-aliasing - none
texture filter - optimal
VS profile - 3_0
PS profile - 3_0
If your monitor doesnt support that resolution than state what you ran it at.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XkCvZ_qRVk
*Edit*
Make sure to run it on stock settings.
res: 1280x1024
anti-aliasing - none
texture filter - optimal
VS profile - 3_0
PS profile - 3_0
If your monitor doesnt support that resolution than state what you ran it at.
#4
03-22-2008, 10:08 AM
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#5
03-22-2008, 12:17 PM
RE: 3dmark06 score challenge
[hr]Main test results
[hr]3DMark Score 8371 3DMarks
SM 2.0 Score 3857
SM 3.0 Score 3768
CPU Score 1981
[hr]Test Results
[hr]Graphics Tests
1 - Return to Proxycon 31.99 FPS
2 - Firefly Forest 32.3 FPS
CPU Tests
CPU1 - Red Valley 0.62 FPS
CPU2 - Red Valley 1.01 FPS
HDR Tests
1 - Canyon Flight (SM 3.0) 34.44 FPS
2 - Deep Freeze (SM 3.0) 40.93 FPS
[hr]General information
[hr]Operating system Microsoft Windows Vista
System type 32-bit
Motherboard manufacturer DFI Corp,LTD
Motherboard model LP UT NF590 SLI
Hard drive model NVIDIA STRIPE 596.18G
Memory 2048 MB
Slot 1 1024 MB
Slot 2 1024 MB
Slot 3 Empty
Slot 4 Empty
[hr]Processor information
[hr]Processor AMD Opteron(tm) Dual-Core
Processor clock 2813 MHz
Physical / logical processors 1 / 2
Multicore 2 Processor Cores
FSB 201 MHz
[hr]Display information
[hr]Graphics card NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320MB/640MB
Graphics card vendor Nvidia Corp
Graphics memory 640.0
Core clock 513.0
Memory clock 792.0
Driver name NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS
Driver version 7.15.11.6375
Driver status WHQL - FM Approved
Linked display adapters No
[hr]3DMark Score 8371 3DMarks
SM 2.0 Score 3857
SM 3.0 Score 3768
CPU Score 1981
[hr]Test Results
[hr]Graphics Tests
1 - Return to Proxycon 31.99 FPS
2 - Firefly Forest 32.3 FPS
CPU Tests
CPU1 - Red Valley 0.62 FPS
CPU2 - Red Valley 1.01 FPS
HDR Tests
1 - Canyon Flight (SM 3.0) 34.44 FPS
2 - Deep Freeze (SM 3.0) 40.93 FPS
[hr]General information
[hr]Operating system Microsoft Windows Vista
System type 32-bit
Motherboard manufacturer DFI Corp,LTD
Motherboard model LP UT NF590 SLI
Hard drive model NVIDIA STRIPE 596.18G
Memory 2048 MB
Slot 1 1024 MB
Slot 2 1024 MB
Slot 3 Empty
Slot 4 Empty
[hr]Processor information
[hr]Processor AMD Opteron(tm) Dual-Core
Processor clock 2813 MHz
Physical / logical processors 1 / 2
Multicore 2 Processor Cores
FSB 201 MHz
[hr]Display information
[hr]Graphics card NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320MB/640MB
Graphics card vendor Nvidia Corp
Graphics memory 640.0
Core clock 513.0
Memory clock 792.0
Driver name NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS
Driver version 7.15.11.6375
Driver status WHQL - FM Approved
Linked display adapters No
#6
03-22-2008, 12:23 PM
RE: 3dmark06 score challenge
ORIGINAL: RCR
I don't get it, does it load cbrforum faster or give it better clarity?
I don't get it, does it load cbrforum faster or give it better clarity?
Scores are pretty much meaningless. It's basically a pissing contest for geeks. The ubber geeks will funnel a ton of money into a system to get that 1 or 2 extra FPS when in the majority of cases the average person would never notice a difference.
I will say, it is the reason why a PC will always have better graphics then consoles. The extra input devices means that we are able to have more complex games to play that are impossible are very difficult to implement on a console.
My PC isn't a slouch, but it is by far the best. I don't need to be on the cutting edge to get my PC to do what I want it to do. I will say, though, my Windows Vista is a little bloated.
#8
03-22-2008, 01:28 PM
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: 3dmark06 score challenge
ORIGINAL: woo545
I will say, it is the reason why a PC will always have better graphics then consoles. The extra input devices means that we are able to have more complex games to play that are impossible are very difficult to implement on a console.
I will say, it is the reason why a PC will always have better graphics then consoles. The extra input devices means that we are able to have more complex games to play that are impossible are very difficult to implement on a console.
#9
03-22-2008, 01:36 PM
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: 3dmark06 score challenge
ORIGINAL: shoortbuss
I'm going to have to disagree with you there. PCs are designed to do a variety of things, and unless somebody dumps THOUSANDS into the best components, it's very difficult to keep up with the next gen consoles. If you're willing the spend the money, and I'm talking upwards of 4 Gs, then you might outclass a PS3, but the price-to-power ratio when it comes to gaming is undoubtedly won by the consols. Consider this....for $500 or $600 you are getting the power of 8 processing units and a state-of-the-art GPU. Not to mention the fact that PC games are scaled down at times to tailor the average home PC, while developers for consol games are able to utilize the full power of the system without thinking about minimum requirements.
ORIGINAL: woo545
I will say, it is the reason why a PC will always have better graphics then consoles. The extra input devices means that we are able to have more complex games to play that are impossible are very difficult to implement on a console.
I will say, it is the reason why a PC will always have better graphics then consoles. The extra input devices means that we are able to have more complex games to play that are impossible are very difficult to implement on a console.
Console games are made by pc's
THIS IS A NO BITCH THREAD. 3DMARK06 TALK AND THATS IT.
#10
03-22-2008, 01:42 PM
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: 3dmark06 score challenge
ORIGINAL: woo545
Plays games better or good for 3D Modeling.
Scores are pretty much meaningless. It's basically a pissing contest for geeks. The ubber geeks will funnel a ton of money into a system to get that 1 or 2 extra FPS when in the majority of cases the average person would never notice a difference.
I will say, it is the reason why a PC will always have better graphics then consoles. The extra input devices means that we are able to have more complex games to play that are impossible are very difficult to implement on a console.
My PC isn't a slouch, but it is by far the best. I don't need to be on the cutting edge to get my PC to do what I want it to do. I will say, though, my Windows Vista is a little bloated.
ORIGINAL: RCR
I don't get it, does it load cbrforum faster or give it better clarity?
I don't get it, does it load cbrforum faster or give it better clarity?
Scores are pretty much meaningless. It's basically a pissing contest for geeks. The ubber geeks will funnel a ton of money into a system to get that 1 or 2 extra FPS when in the majority of cases the average person would never notice a difference.
I will say, it is the reason why a PC will always have better graphics then consoles. The extra input devices means that we are able to have more complex games to play that are impossible are very difficult to implement on a console.
My PC isn't a slouch, but it is by far the best. I don't need to be on the cutting edge to get my PC to do what I want it to do. I will say, though, my Windows Vista is a little bloated.
Yup. Its just like putting your vehicle/bike on a dyno. Its just to see what power it has. The "real world" performance is what matters. I've just been farting around with my pc.
Also on "why" people spend money on pcs. Its just like your bike. Do you need a different muffler? No. Do you need a power commander? No. You buy them cause you can and want to.