Does this make sense?
#1
Does this make sense?
A few weeks back, I took off my Coffman shorty pipe and reinstalled the stock exhaust in an attempt to increase my "stealth" factor. A couple of tanks of gas later, I noticed I was getting 1-2 mpg worse. At first I attributed it to the fact that I was running the bike higher in the rev range because it was so much quieter and I wasn't worried about pissing off homeowners living on the routes on which I do my hard riding. Regardless of how I rode, the mpg never was quite was as good as with the Coffman, so I put it back on a few days ago and, sure enough, mpg jumped back up in the 40-41 range.
The only other mod I have done is the clean air/block off plate mod. Anyone have a possible explanation for this?
Oh, side note - I did a few 3rd and 4th gear pulls from 30-70 with both exhausts from a set point and could feel no difference. Additionally, 70 came up at almost the exact same point in the road with either exhaust on. If there is a hp loss with the shorty, it's too small for me to tell!
Other side note - I know it's totally superficial but the exhaust from the short pipe is just so much more visceral. I'm keeping it on and just need to remember to not be a highway hooligan...
The only other mod I have done is the clean air/block off plate mod. Anyone have a possible explanation for this?
Oh, side note - I did a few 3rd and 4th gear pulls from 30-70 with both exhausts from a set point and could feel no difference. Additionally, 70 came up at almost the exact same point in the road with either exhaust on. If there is a hp loss with the shorty, it's too small for me to tell!
Other side note - I know it's totally superficial but the exhaust from the short pipe is just so much more visceral. I'm keeping it on and just need to remember to not be a highway hooligan...
#2
Maybe....
If the bike is 200kg wet weight (nice round number) and you're adding 1 mpg more with the standard pipe then is this due to extra weight of the pipe (and a slight constriction of airflow)? 200kg/40mpg is around 5kg per mpg, how light is your aftermarket can versus the standard can? (Rider and luggage weight not considered.)
If the bike is 200kg wet weight (nice round number) and you're adding 1 mpg more with the standard pipe then is this due to extra weight of the pipe (and a slight constriction of airflow)? 200kg/40mpg is around 5kg per mpg, how light is your aftermarket can versus the standard can? (Rider and luggage weight not considered.)
#3
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post