old vs new 600s
#11
07-21-2009, 01:21 PM
100 down to 85 = 1.25
65 down to 45 = 1.625x
That means more torque was lost as a ratio than horsepower... a lot more.
I realize that HP is torque-rpm so that makes some sense... just surprised me to see that big a jump. I'd have to get a piece of paper out to work out the max hp and max torque rpms.
65 down to 45 = 1.625x
That means more torque was lost as a ratio than horsepower... a lot more.
I realize that HP is torque-rpm so that makes some sense... just surprised me to see that big a jump. I'd have to get a piece of paper out to work out the max hp and max torque rpms.
ive seen somewhere for the f4i its 109 hp @ 12,500 ....
itedit...heres a 2001 f4i for example http://www.bikez.com/motorcycles/hon...sport_2001.php
Last edited by nickels; 07-21-2009 at 01:25 PM.
#12
07-21-2009, 04:29 PM
This is getting a bit off topic - but I do know the hp marks for an F4 and F4i... I've got my own dyno results here.
My point was that the rate of loss for torque was much higher than hp. That makes sense because hp is a product of torque... from that bit of information you can then figure out the rest. It is mathmatically interesting
My point was that the rate of loss for torque was much higher than hp. That makes sense because hp is a product of torque... from that bit of information you can then figure out the rest. It is mathmatically interesting
#13
07-21-2009, 07:56 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Marietta, Ohio
Posts: 533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
