old vs new 600s
I Can't Sell On CBRF
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2
Likes: 1
From: TN
100 down to 85 = 1.25
65 down to 45 = 1.625x
That means more torque was lost as a ratio than horsepower... a lot more.
I realize that HP is torque-rpm so that makes some sense... just surprised me to see that big a jump. I'd have to get a piece of paper out to work out the max hp and max torque rpms.
65 down to 45 = 1.625x
That means more torque was lost as a ratio than horsepower... a lot more.
I realize that HP is torque-rpm so that makes some sense... just surprised me to see that big a jump. I'd have to get a piece of paper out to work out the max hp and max torque rpms.
ive seen somewhere for the f4i its 109 hp @ 12,500 ....
itedit...heres a 2001 f4i for example http://www.bikez.com/motorcycles/hon...sport_2001.php
Last edited by nickels; Jul 21, 2009 at 01:25 PM.
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,127
Likes: 1
From: NS, Canada
This is getting a bit off topic - but I do know the hp marks for an F4 and F4i... I've got my own dyno results here.
My point was that the rate of loss for torque was much higher than hp. That makes sense because hp is a product of torque... from that bit of information you can then figure out the rest. It is mathmatically interesting
My point was that the rate of loss for torque was much higher than hp. That makes sense because hp is a product of torque... from that bit of information you can then figure out the rest. It is mathmatically interesting
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
