whooped buy a 636
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,495
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, California
RE: whooped buy a 636
ORIGINAL: outsider8
then a/my 954??? 
ORIGINAL: demonchild
thats about right for a 600, maybe a little faster.
thats about right for a 600, maybe a little faster.
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 0
From:
RE: whooped buy a 636
ORIGINAL: demonchild
I just saw this. outsider, can you pls clarify WTF you are talking about? Im [sm=wtf.gif]
ORIGINAL: outsider8
then a/my 954??? 
ORIGINAL: demonchild
thats about right for a 600, maybe a little faster.
thats about right for a 600, maybe a little faster.
you replied-"thats about right for a 600, maybe a little faster. "
then i replied "then a/my 954???
"im sorry i misread your post
now that i read it again-you replied to this-"I let him take mine and I took his and I toped it out at 142 does that sound about right for the 600? "
its all good!!-my bad
600 hasnt even come close!!
Jan 2009 ROTM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,493
Likes: 0
RE: whooped buy a 636
ORIGINAL: dorkbiker
I think, repeat think, there is a point of diminishing return on more CCs. A new 600, tuned correctly, and with a rider who isn't too big, should easily pull along with just about any bike. It's the old power/weight thing.
I think, repeat think, there is a point of diminishing return on more CCs. A new 600, tuned correctly, and with a rider who isn't too big, should easily pull along with just about any bike. It's the old power/weight thing.
I see what you are saying, but you are still forgetting about a little thing called torque, and the 600's from 3k to 10k just dont have it.
