1000 Modifications This section is specifically for questions and advice pertaining to mods of the current 1000 models.

Air Filter : Orginal vs K&N

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 23, 2006 | 07:11 AM
  #1  
pmt's Avatar
pmt
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From:
Default Air Filter : Orginal vs K&N

Hi,

It's time to change the air filter of my 1kRR '05 but i'm not sure what is the best option.... by Original one again or by a K&N?

what should be the best option? what are the pros and cons?

the only mod I have done was installing a Arrow split-on.

thanks!
 
Reply
Old May 23, 2006 | 10:27 AM
  #2  
Anubis's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,160
Likes: 0
Default RE: Air Filter : Orginal vs K&N

I went down the K&N route, there discussions goin on both sides of the arguement. Bottom line is its reuseable thats why i got mine.

For the Record it made 152HP at the wheel when dyno`ed.
 
Reply
Old May 23, 2006 | 08:12 PM
  #3  
kryptonite_cycle's Avatar
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Air Filter : Orginal vs K&N

just purchased k&n for my 06 cbr1000rr...had k&n in my ninja 600, have FPKI cold air k&n system in my dakota 5.9L r/t, k&n in wifes beetle. GO FOR IT
 
Reply
Old May 23, 2006 | 09:34 PM
  #4  
sidthafish's Avatar
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 58
Likes: 1
From:
Default RE: Air Filter : Orginal vs K&N

Rumor control sez you lose HP with K&N. Supposedly BMC race or street filters is the way to go depending on what level of filtering you want but might require remapping of PC (if you have one). Seems pricey no matter what you do $117+ BMC/$95+ K&N but both are reusable.
 
Reply
Old May 24, 2006 | 07:25 PM
  #5  
rocketdogbert's Avatar
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 18
Likes: 1
From:
Default RE: Air Filter : Orginal vs K&N

ORIGINAL: sidthafish

Rumor control sez you lose HP with K&N. Supposedly BMC race or street filters is the way to go depending on what level of filtering you want but might require remapping of PC (if you have one). Seems pricey no matter what you do $117+ BMC/$95+ K&N but both are reusable.
+1

 
Reply
Old May 26, 2006 | 08:39 AM
  #6  
Seltorque's Avatar
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Air Filter : Orginal vs K&N

I have been advised against K&N,been told stock filter is actually better. better still is the BMC filter.
 
Reply
Old May 27, 2006 | 02:38 AM
  #7  
jaxx1671's Avatar
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Air Filter : Orginal vs K&N

ok, other than the BMC race filter only having 2 layers and the street having 4 whats the diff, what would be the problem with the race filter on the road. I dont know what the diff in the air would be from track to street.
 
Reply
Old May 27, 2006 | 02:54 AM
  #8  
Seltorque's Avatar
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Air Filter : Orginal vs K&N

As you know the Race has 2 layer will have less restriction in air flow. More air = more fuel = more power. However at the time of purchase. The street filters were out of stock. Only had the Race version. So I thought sod it! fit em to the bike! cost me US$75 including fitting.
 
Reply
Old May 27, 2006 | 07:33 AM
  #9  
Anubis's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,160
Likes: 0
Default RE: Air Filter : Orginal vs K&N

Race filters are designs to allow more air as said, which normally = more power. But........ There aint no crap on the track that you get on the road, so use a race filter on the road and all that sh*t goes in your engine.

+ if you ask Most racers don`t use an air filter on there bikes.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Turbulenz
CBR 600F4
6
Feb 19, 2010 05:09 PM
c_keeton600f4
CBR 600F4
7
Dec 28, 2009 02:43 PM
knownaschucky
CBR 600F2
3
Oct 4, 2007 11:42 AM
usndocjaysin
General Tech
8
Sep 21, 2007 10:18 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:14 PM.