Off Topic A place for you CBR junkies to boldly go off topic. Almost anything goes.
View Poll Results: 48÷2(9+3) = ????
2
30
54.55%
288
25
45.45%
Voters: 55. You may not vote on this poll

Are we smarter than bodybuilders?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #81  
Old 04-08-2011, 02:51 PM
jp_greenville13's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Rockford, MI
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

288
 
  #82  
Old 04-08-2011, 02:56 PM
__Z__'s Avatar
April 2011 Ride of the Month
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

oh so i was right then.... i feel lost
 
  #83  
Old 04-08-2011, 03:02 PM
yumoncbr's Avatar
August 2011 ROTM
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Aloha State
Posts: 1,264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by __Z__
oh so i was right then.... i feel lost
I am with you _Z_ very lost
 
  #84  
Old 04-08-2011, 03:09 PM
Ragnar1x's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jp_greenville13
The distributive property changes the problem.



That doesn't make any sense. I used an algebraic rule, correctly mind you, on an algebra problem and you say I changed the problem.
Thats the beauty of algebra, you can use any rule that applies and it does not change the problem. You can make the same problem look so many different ways. There are tons of ways to manipulate algebra without changing the problem.

Perhaps different textbooks say different things. Because everybody is so set on the fact that they are right. In all of my algebra classes, the answer would be 2 though.
 

Last edited by Ragnar1x; 04-08-2011 at 03:13 PM.
  #85  
Old 04-08-2011, 03:21 PM
adrenalnjunky's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: West Monroe,Louisiana
Posts: 1,753
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

288 (and I clicked 2 yesterday myself) I'm not reading all 7 pages, but every explanation of the Order of Operations I remember and read agrees with JP - since Multiplication and division are at the same rank, same ranking processes are then performed left to right.

End it once in for all, will someone just plug it into a damn Ti8x-series calculator and see what pops out. Post pics or it didn't happen :-)
 
  #86  
Old 04-08-2011, 03:26 PM
Ragnar1x's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by adrenalnjunky
288 (and I clicked 2 yesterday myself) I'm not reading all 7 pages, but every explanation of the Order of Operations I remember and read agrees with JP - since Multiplication and division are at the same rank, same ranking processes are then performed left to right.

End it once in for all, will someone just plug it into a damn Ti8x-series calculator and see what pops out. Post pics or it didn't happen :-)
Check pg 4. theres a pic of two TI's showing two different answers. Calculators are only as smart as those who program them.

Also, order of operations puts multiplication ahead of division. PEMDAS
 
  #87  
Old 04-08-2011, 03:26 PM
PlayfulGod's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Dalton, GA
Posts: 6,026
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

My TI-30X IIS says 288 lol and thats plugging in exactly what was posted
 
  #88  
Old 04-08-2011, 03:31 PM
adrenalnjunky's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: West Monroe,Louisiana
Posts: 1,753
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ragnar1x
Check pg 4. theres a pic of two TI's showing two different answers. Calculators are only as smart as those who program them.

Also, order of operations puts multiplication ahead of division. PEMDAS
So who is the ultimate source for that rule on M&D - cause I find several places citing that the M&D are infact equally ranked operations.

Matter of fact I can't find any resource that doesn't state that Multiplication and Division don't rank equally, and in that case you perform equally ranked operations from left to right.
 
  #89  
Old 04-08-2011, 03:42 PM
__Z__'s Avatar
April 2011 Ride of the Month
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I HAVE FOUND THE SOLUTIONS TO THIS PROBLEM....

if the equation is presented in a single line equation the answer is in fact 288

it the problem is presented with two rows a top half and a bottom half the answer is 2

PROBLEM SOLVED WE ALL WIN
 
  #90  
Old 04-08-2011, 03:47 PM
jeffjones's Avatar
Welcome Crew and May 2012 Ride of the Month
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Kitchener, Ontario
Posts: 1,563
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ragnar1x
Jpan, there is indeed an imaginary bracket. 2(9+3) can be distributed to (2*9+2*3) the 2 is distributive.

Guys please think about the arguments countering yours; 2 is indeed the correct and only answer.
People it seems all the people that do math for a career get 2.
The above quote is exactly how it is done.
2 is part of the bracket because it is distributive.
So therefore as everyone has agreed so far Brackets are before multiplication and division.

Originally Posted by jpanside@gmail.com
They better not be working in my state.
Well if you want stuff to work right you would hope they would be in your state.
It definitely not a coincidence how every engineer who spent 3-4 years in university doing complex math says its 2?
 

Last edited by jeffjones; 04-08-2011 at 03:50 PM.


Quick Reply: Are we smarter than bodybuilders?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:19 AM.