Pt.2 of my parking lot GP series
give ya credit for skill, and a slap on the back of the head for doing it without proper gear lol. But like ya said you knew the risk. But I dont recommend nor suggest anyone try this w/o proper gear esp if they dont know what they are doing.
And yes any 'sportbike' can get down like that. just may take a lil more effort.
And yes any 'sportbike' can get down like that. just may take a lil more effort.
yah man where is your GEAR?! haha
About my gear (my t-shirt) ..the guy following me is one of the best stunt riders in town and we were there with a few other friends of his. For that one day and that one session I look back and am happy I threw caution to the wind. YES I always were armour, even just going to get ice cream at albertsons, but on that day and with those guys it was a brilliant feeling we all had. I showed a couple of them how to drag knee for the first time and we just generally shredded that place.
JPANSIDE-- dont you ever try leaning a ton on a bike you arent willing to crash. theres a reason the bike in my video looks that way! and never try stuff on the street. only an empty lot.
Yes to all of that ^^^^
About my gear (my t-shirt) ..the guy following me is one of the best stunt riders in town and we were there with a few other friends of his. For that one day and that one session I look back and am happy I threw caution to the wind. YES I always were armour, even just going to get ice cream at albertsons, but on that day and with those guys it was a brilliant feeling we all had. I showed a couple of them how to drag knee for the first time and we just generally shredded that place.
JPANSIDE-- dont you ever try leaning a ton on a bike you arent willing to crash. theres a reason the bike in my video looks that way! and never try stuff on the street. only an empty lot.
About my gear (my t-shirt) ..the guy following me is one of the best stunt riders in town and we were there with a few other friends of his. For that one day and that one session I look back and am happy I threw caution to the wind. YES I always were armour, even just going to get ice cream at albertsons, but on that day and with those guys it was a brilliant feeling we all had. I showed a couple of them how to drag knee for the first time and we just generally shredded that place.
JPANSIDE-- dont you ever try leaning a ton on a bike you arent willing to crash. theres a reason the bike in my video looks that way! and never try stuff on the street. only an empty lot.
To the Op, yea we all go squidly once and awhile lol but still I think everyone gets what I was/am saying.
Have you seen my elbow dragging thing? The point is, I would never do that stuff on a bike I wasnt willing to crash. My 929 is beautiful and so no. No I would not risk that bike. Check it out man:
ELBOW DRAGGING
You're right, not hostile at all. You just look mad stretched over like you're simply trying to be close to the ground. Which is all fine and dandy for a goofy parking lot video, and is closer to the ground than I've been. But I'd hate for more inexperienced riders to think that it's a good way to ride anywhere besides a goofy parking lot video.
It's still cool to watch
It's still cool to watch
There are 3 basic cornering techniques:
1. Your upper body remains mostly upright while you lean the bike down under you. Moto cross or dirt style.
2. Your body remains centered on the seat and in line with the center of gravity of the bike. This is old school racing or normal street riding style.
3. Your body hangs off the seat, and the riders center of gravity moves down and to the inside of the corner. Modern racing or 'knee dragging' style.
When you exceed a certain speed for a given turn radius, you are forced by physics to either slow down or to adopt a knee dragging style (even if you intentionally hold your knee in.) If your speed starts to exceed a knee dragging style you either have to slow down or adopt an elbow dragging style. Theres no other choices. If the tires and clearance could support it, you would eventually start to drag your shoulder, etc.. The POINT is: you need increasing speed to support increasing lean angles. You need speed to support hanging off. Otherwise the bike would just topple over.
I promise you this Aken, if you tried to follow behind me in that goofy parking lot video using a normal street style, I'm going to lap you pretty quickly. I have no doubt about that at all.
1. Your upper body remains mostly upright while you lean the bike down under you. Moto cross or dirt style.
2. Your body remains centered on the seat and in line with the center of gravity of the bike. This is old school racing or normal street riding style.
3. Your body hangs off the seat, and the riders center of gravity moves down and to the inside of the corner. Modern racing or 'knee dragging' style.
When you exceed a certain speed for a given turn radius, you are forced by physics to either slow down or to adopt a knee dragging style (even if you intentionally hold your knee in.) If your speed starts to exceed a knee dragging style you either have to slow down or adopt an elbow dragging style. Theres no other choices. If the tires and clearance could support it, you would eventually start to drag your shoulder, etc.. The POINT is: you need increasing speed to support increasing lean angles. You need speed to support hanging off. Otherwise the bike would just topple over.
I promise you this Aken, if you tried to follow behind me in that goofy parking lot video using a normal street style, I'm going to lap you pretty quickly. I have no doubt about that at all.
Last edited by motorcycle5; Jun 5, 2009 at 12:56 AM.
When you exceed a certain speed for a given turn radius, you are forced by physics to either slow down or to adopt a knee dragging style (even if you intentionally hold your knee in.) If your speed starts to exceed a knee dragging style you either have to slow down or adopt an elbow dragging style. Theres no other choices. If the tires and clearance could support it, you would eventually start to drag your shoulder, etc.. The POINT is: you need increasing speed to support increasing lean angles. You need speed to support hanging off. Otherwise the bike would just topple over.
.
Lets take a racer on the track who is about to drag his elbow on a corner: the elbow drag requires a certain body position and also speed. Our racer knows this already. So as the corner approaches the racer is leaning the bike, lowering his body position, and making sure he is matching the speed to those things. The racers intention to drag his elbow comes first in the sequence. The other things are interconnected by force.. you cant separate them. And I would say you cant insist one comes before the other. Not speed, not lean, not body position.
The missing link is that our racer knows what he is going to do before he does it. That fact isnt accounted for when you lay out the physics of what goes on in a corner. So do you match the speed to the body position, or do you match the body position to the speed? It doesnt matter how you formulate it, because they are interdependent! But you had better do it!
what do you think?
As a thought experiment, if you took a rider from 100 years ago and put them on a modern bike with modern slicks, and told them they needed to negotiate an indicated radius at certain speed (elbow dragging speed), and without them having ever seen or heard about hanging off, what do you suppose might happen? Would they say its impossible? Would they simply keep crashing? Or would they discover on their own that they needed to hang off, knee drag, and all the rest. What do you think?
The missing link is that our racer knows what he is going to do before he does it. That fact isnt accounted for when you lay out the physics of what goes on in a corner. So do you match the speed to the body position, or do you match the body position to the speed? It doesnt matter how you formulate it, because they are interdependent! But you had better do it!

what do you think?
As a thought experiment, if you took a rider from 100 years ago and put them on a modern bike with modern slicks, and told them they needed to negotiate an indicated radius at certain speed (elbow dragging speed), and without them having ever seen or heard about hanging off, what do you suppose might happen? Would they say its impossible? Would they simply keep crashing? Or would they discover on their own that they needed to hang off, knee drag, and all the rest. What do you think?
Last edited by motorcycle5; Jun 5, 2009 at 08:56 AM.
Lets take a racer on the track who is about to drag his elbow on a corner: the elbow drag requires a certain body position and also speed. Our racer knows this already. So as the corner approaches the racer is leaning the bike, lowering his body position, and making sure he is matching the speed to those things. The racers intention to drag his elbow comes first in the sequence. The other things are interconnected by force.. you cant separate them. And I would say you cant insist one comes before the other. Not speed, not lean, not body position.
The missing link is that our racer knows what he is going to do before he does it. That fact isnt accounted for when you lay out the physics of what goes on in a corner. So do you match the speed to the body position, or do you match the body position to the speed? It doesnt matter how you formulate it, because they are interdependent! But you had better do it!
what do you think?
As a thought experiment, if you took a rider from 100 years ago and put them on a modern bike with modern slicks, and told them they needed to negotiate an indicated radius at certain speed (elbow dragging speed), and without them having ever seen or heard about hanging off, what do you suppose might happen? Would they say its impossible? Would they simply keep crashing? Or would they discover on their own that they needed to hang off, knee drag, and all the rest. What do you think?
The missing link is that our racer knows what he is going to do before he does it. That fact isnt accounted for when you lay out the physics of what goes on in a corner. So do you match the speed to the body position, or do you match the body position to the speed? It doesnt matter how you formulate it, because they are interdependent! But you had better do it!

what do you think?
As a thought experiment, if you took a rider from 100 years ago and put them on a modern bike with modern slicks, and told them they needed to negotiate an indicated radius at certain speed (elbow dragging speed), and without them having ever seen or heard about hanging off, what do you suppose might happen? Would they say its impossible? Would they simply keep crashing? Or would they discover on their own that they needed to hang off, knee drag, and all the rest. What do you think?
you seem to have some skills, more so than myself. And like you stated, you have a bike to play and learn on, and you have a bike that you baby and take of. Most riders dont nor can afford to do so, yet most want to emulate what they watch and read about (esp newbs) w/o getting the riding exp they need b4 they attempt the more advanced stuff. They wont to skip nailing the basics or after doing so think they never have to practice them ever again, and just want to learn the 'cool' stuff. Did you know most riders cant do low speed maneuvers? most are terrified of riding in the rain, on gravel and grass? yet they want to go drag a knee (or elbows), stunt, ride wheelies etc?


