Bike + cop car =..................
#21
12-09-2007, 02:32 PM
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Bike + cop car =..................
ORIGINAL: OKIEZAC
not to mention the cop playing with his head and helmet while hes laying motionless on the groung..
PS they were saying that he ran a red light into the cop car not why they were pulling him over.. either way.. stupid militant texas cops..
not to mention the cop playing with his head and helmet while hes laying motionless on the groung..
PS they were saying that he ran a red light into the cop car not why they were pulling him over.. either way.. stupid militant texas cops..
The female is the one laying in the intersection.
#22
12-09-2007, 03:24 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location:
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#24
12-09-2007, 03:54 PM
RE: Bike + cop car =..................
ORIGINAL: fishfryer527
The cops can't not stop a runner because they feel they may hurt him or else noone would ever stop. I hope the biker does real jail time and get a serious ***-raping everydaywhile in prison. Like I said, I feel bad for the passenger, fukk the biker.
The cops can't not stop a runner because they feel they may hurt him or else noone would ever stop. I hope the biker does real jail time and get a serious ***-raping everydaywhile in prison. Like I said, I feel bad for the passenger, fukk the biker.
#25
12-09-2007, 05:27 PM
Senior Member
RE: Bike + cop car =..................
I read in a mag. that the crown vicswere governed(sp) at 129mphs. Police officers have no reason to go faster then that because they have other means of stopping a vehicle running that fast, plus its not safe.
http://www.modernracer.com/features/fordcrownvictoriacop.html
http://www.modernracer.com/features/fordcrownvictoriacop.html
#26
12-09-2007, 05:34 PM
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Seattle WA
Posts: 1,113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#27
12-09-2007, 05:59 PM
Retired Moderator
RE: Bike + cop car =..................
I don't agree with the ftp comments but in this particular case fbot (both of them) .. at first I didn't see any evidence of running, I know half the time at stop lights I can't see s*&t behind me and the officer just lit him up but didn't turn on siren 'til rider was out of sight. Looking at the vid, I can't tell if the lights came on b4 he started hauling A or after (not that it makes a difference, just wondering if that's why he lit him up). But in the 2nd vid, he didn't seem to slow down when approaching the 2nd unit with his siren and lights going which makes me think he must've been running. Either way, the passenger def. didn't deserve the tactic used.
#28
12-09-2007, 06:09 PM
RE: Bike + cop car =..................
ORIGINAL: Kewl Breeze
i know half the time at stop lights I can't see s*&t behind me
i know half the time at stop lights I can't see s*&t behind me
#29
12-09-2007, 09:45 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 1,495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Bike + cop car =..................
ORIGINAL: randyjoy
Simple answer: The use of deadly force is not justified underTexas lawto stop a traffic violator. Officer was wrong. If it was OK, he wouldn't have been suspended for 60 days; wouldn't be surprised if additional charges/lawsuits come about.
Simple answer: The use of deadly force is not justified underTexas lawto stop a traffic violator. Officer was wrong. If it was OK, he wouldn't have been suspended for 60 days; wouldn't be surprised if additional charges/lawsuits come about.
The cop probably should not have done what he did. The key work is probably. However, in the heat of the moment, the cop probably thought that even the biggest jackass would stop the bike if he saw red and blue lights blocking his direction of travel.
#30
12-09-2007, 09:46 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 1,495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts