20 th Anniversary Review of Supersport 1000F

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 30, 2009 | 05:30 AM
  #1  
cbrsixpack's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
November 2009 ROTM
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 956
Likes: 0
Default 20 th Anniversary Review of Supersport 1000F

Aussie review,interesting reading,comparo to the 1000RR at the end.
Dated 2006 lol........

http://www.mcnews.com.au/NewsArchive...ry_cbr1000.htm
 
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2009 | 10:34 AM
  #2  
Shadow's Avatar
Redcoat, & Maxwell's Silver Hammer, MVN and curmudgeon
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 11,608
Likes: 5
From: Mud hut, Zululand
Default

Thanks Rob - great read !
 
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2009 | 02:30 PM
  #3  
JHouse's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,441
Likes: 0
From: Houston Exburbs
Default

Very informative. I love this stuff.
 
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2009 | 12:19 AM
  #4  
Tom1000f's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
Default

No idea the 1000f stands up to the 1000rr so well. Thanks great info
 
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2009 | 08:36 AM
  #5  
malbojah's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 902
Likes: 0
From: Cape Cod, MA
Default

Originally Posted by Tom1000f
No idea the 1000f stands up to the 1000rr so well. Thanks great info

The article seems to go back and forth comparing the original 1000 to the 1kF to the RR. Also, the measurements at the end of the article use the original 1000, not the 1kF
 
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2009 | 07:22 PM
  #6  
pacojoseph's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
From: Philly, PA USA
Default

Originally Posted by malbojah
the measurements at the end of the article use the original 1000, not the 1kF
What's the difference? The original 1000 is a 1KF.
 
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2009 | 07:55 PM
  #7  
Oscar Foxtrot's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: Sydney, Australia
Default

Hmm, yes: interesting article. I do have an anorak (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anorak_(slang)) comment, though .

The article says the 1kF at 60mph is at 3750rpm and the RR is 4110rpm. Last Sunday I rode my mate's '07 FireBlade and noticed that at 4000rpm the speedo said about 105kph, then, on Monday, I rode my '89 1kF and at 4000rpm the speedo also said about 105kph. Yeah, yeah: inaccurate speedos, whatever, but the article implies fairly different gearing which my highly scientific observations didn't confirm.

One area the 1000F outperforms the RR big-time is in comfort: 500km on the FireBlade and I was ready to be hositalised...
 
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2009 | 09:15 AM
  #8  
kaska's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
From: Bern, Switzerland/
Default

how is it possible that on that review the braking distance on hurricane is shorter than fireblade? And 2,75 sec to 100kph ? really those are numbers to be proud but are those real also? I always thought that she goes a bit over 3 seconds to 100kph.
And the brakes at least on my bike are definitely not that good as 09 fireblade.
 
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2009 | 11:32 AM
  #9  
SamkFL's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
From: kenya nairobi
Default

gr8 article..makes me love her more..will b doing some minor shock adjustments tomorrow.then she will b in tip top shape..
 
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2009 | 06:56 PM
  #10  
Oscar Foxtrot's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: Sydney, Australia
Default

Originally Posted by Oscar Foxtrot
...and I was ready to be hositalised...
Sigh. I probably meant "hospitalised".
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hawkwind
The Hurricane Saloon
19
Aug 30, 2009 08:30 PM
CBR-1000Freak
The Hurricane Saloon
45
Aug 17, 2009 09:14 AM
vl5150
CBR 1000F "Hurricane"
2
Jun 15, 2008 09:09 PM
steveboot
CBR 1000F "Hurricane"
5
May 20, 2007 01:24 PM
pacojoseph
CBR 1000F "Hurricane"
4
May 17, 2007 10:11 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:22 AM.