I have heard very differernt things when it comes down to the set-up of the sprockets and the result of doing so. So i figured i would try and put an end to all of it. Ive been reading that alot of people decide on buying the -1 tooth front sprocket and then just leave it at that. Well with the -1 tooth front sprocket you get more acceleration but less top end, right? well the mechanic at the local shop doesnt seem to think so, he told a buddy of mine that by adding 2 teeth to the front sprocket would increase acceleration, but decrease top speed. Could the mechanic be wrong? it just seems like common sense that the smaller the front sprocket the better acceleration you would get because it puts less stress on the motor. So i guess the problem i have is that there are 2 different opinions on how sprockets work in relation to their size. I wish there was like a chart that actually showed different levels of performance based upon what sprocket set-up you have. Ive always thought of buying the -1 tooth on the front sprocket just to get more acceleration, but also to still keep the bike relatively close to its stock powerband. Ive just been hearing two different sides of this, and if anybody has any clue on how this sprocket thing works, let me know. Thanks

 

The mechanics wrong, [sm=headbang.gif]

1 tooth down on the front will give the desired effect, alot of people put a +2 teeth sprocket on the rear at the same time,

have a look at this................

https://cbrforum.com/m_17497/tm.htm

 

I just did -1 in the front and +2 on the rear and it made a big difference in low end power. It doesnt really lag anymore it just gets up and goes. It still wont pull the tire off the ground though by just throttling it. It knocked my speedo way off now though when im going 83 im really going 70mph

 

i heard that taking off one tooth on the front is like putting 3 on the back. its better cause then u dont need to buy a new chain. think of it like a bicycle its really easy that way. at least thats how i do it.

 

the mechanic got it backwards

 

I've avoided it altogether because of engine wear. Does anyone have any comments on that?