how to determine if forks are straight
#1
#2
The only accurate way of doing it is to dismantle your forks and use a dial indicator to measure the runout of the tubes in thousands of an inch. You'll have to get the specs, but I dont think the runout can exceed .005". But again, I'm not sure of the exact spec. I dont know of a way to do it while the forks are still assembled. Unless its a really bad bend, it wont be obvious to the naked eye.
#3
#4
Guest
Posts: n/a
#6
Thanks for all the replies everyone.
Here's my story...
https://cbrforum.com/forum/f4i-main-forum-11/wrecked-89384/
But from what I can see they *look* straight. But I suppose the eyes can be decieving.
Here's my story...
https://cbrforum.com/forum/f4i-main-forum-11/wrecked-89384/
But from what I can see they *look* straight. But I suppose the eyes can be decieving.
#7
Quite a story. Looks like you have done a few burnouts on that rear too lol.
Like you said they look fine though. What i would do is throw about a hundred measurements on em. Mark them in symmetrical locations. Write down all of your numbers. It should all balance. If it doesn't add up then you will know something is awry. Possibly, even graph the numbers and scale everything down into a drawing.
Like you said they look fine though. What i would do is throw about a hundred measurements on em. Mark them in symmetrical locations. Write down all of your numbers. It should all balance. If it doesn't add up then you will know something is awry. Possibly, even graph the numbers and scale everything down into a drawing.
Last edited by Endless; 04-01-2009 at 05:18 PM. Reason: brain term malfunction
#8
Guest
Posts: n/a
Thanks for all the replies everyone.
Here's my story...
https://cbrforum.com/forum/showthread.php?t=89384
But from what I can see they *look* straight. But I suppose the eyes can be decieving.
Here's my story...
https://cbrforum.com/forum/showthread.php?t=89384
But from what I can see they *look* straight. But I suppose the eyes can be decieving.
I just checked your other story thread ..wowww! shes was wrecked alright
No wonder the buzzards are circling
I spose thats one good thing about this place ...nuthin goes to waste ..
good luck with your parting out mate ...
#9
Quite a story. Looks like you have done a few burnouts on that rear too lol.
Like you said they look fine though. What i would do is throw about a hundred measures on em. Mark them in symmetrical locations. Write down all of your numbers. It should all balance. If it doesn't add up then you will know something is awry. Possibly, even graph the numbers and scale everything down into a drawing.
Like you said they look fine though. What i would do is throw about a hundred measures on em. Mark them in symmetrical locations. Write down all of your numbers. It should all balance. If it doesn't add up then you will know something is awry. Possibly, even graph the numbers and scale everything down into a drawing.
#10
Crash detective 101 says: It could be from the initial incident. 150 yrds past the instability point and you were still flying indicates that you probably had the rear brakes locked rather than the fronts which would have slowed you easily within 25yrds. ie: flat spot that looks like balding from burnouts. I think i read somewhere that over 75% of your breaking should come from the front. I suppose it would be kind of hard to feather the front in a "death wobble" though.