General Tech Good at troubleshooting? Have a non specific issue? Discuss general tech topics here.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

beating a dead horse GAS question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 07-17-2007, 10:06 AM
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location:
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: beating a dead horse GAS question

+1. perfect assessment. i don't know about the mtbe, but all the pumps around dallas say "contains ethanol". do some reading about knock limits of fuels. the higher the octane rating, the higher the knock limit. 89 will have a higher knock limit than 87, and 93 than 89, diesel much, much higher than 93, etc. three things determine the knock limit you need your fuel to have: ignition timing, compression (be it static compression ratio or boost level), and heat. lower octane fuels burn more quickly. on a stock engine that recommends 86 octane like my 03 600rr, you need to run 86 octane, or the closest thing you have to it (probably 87). the computer is tuned so that the spark comes just at the right time for this fuel to combust fully during the power stroke. if you advance your ignition timing, the combustion starts sooner, and you may benefit from a higher grade fuel. if you increase the compression ratio, the fuel will burn faster, and you will probably benefit from a higher grade fuel. if you're running high levels of boost, hopefully you've got a knock sensor, and you'd almost definitely benefit from a higher grade fuel. and if you're getting pinging and knock running 87 on your factory engine that recommends 86, you should probably check and see why you're getting pinging and knock, but in the mean time, you could benefit from a higher grade fuel. on my f150, which took 87 octane, the o2 sensor was fouled (HC and CO readings out the roof), and i got lots and lots of pinging under load when i ran anything less than 93 octane. so i ran 93 for a year and masked the problem, probably made it worse, and then replaced the o2 sensor and it fixed everything. all that to say, you're not doing yourself any favors by running a higher grade fuel "just to be safe". using that logic, you could run oils with moly additives "just to be safe". hey, why not? because the vehicle wasn't designed for that. unless you have any real reason to do otherwise, always run what the manual tells you.
 
  #12  
Old 07-17-2007, 10:52 AM
Join Date: May 2007
Location:
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: beating a dead horse GAS question

Ive always heard to use what the manual calls for andwhen I looked into what my bike calls for Im pretty sure it calls for 91 octane. Could be wrong and ill double check tonight, but Im almost sure I read that...
 
  #13  
Old 07-17-2007, 11:25 AM
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: beating a dead horse GAS question

I use 89 just to be safe
 
  #14  
Old 07-19-2007, 12:20 AM
urandaman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location:
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: beating a dead horse GAS question

so i put 89 in there last night.. and today when i get above 6k and let off, it will blow white smoke out the exhaust.. what would cause this? its not thick.. but its deffinately noticeable... i filled up at a Valero(sp) if that has anything to do with it
 
  #15  
Old 07-19-2007, 12:37 AM
Join Date: May 2006
Location: YES THAT IS A 900 ENGINE IN A F2 ON SPRAY
Posts: 1,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: beating a dead horse GAS question

ORIGINAL: urandaman

it will blow white smoke out the exhaust.. what would cause this? its not thick.. but its deffinately noticeable...
by the manual--
piston oil ring worn
cylinders worn, cracked or scored
valve oil seal damaged
valve guide worn
engine oil level too high
head gasket broke between oil return and cylinder
clogged breather hose

i would do a compression check and monitor the cylinders..
 
  #16  
Old 07-19-2007, 12:41 AM
urandaman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location:
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: beating a dead horse GAS question

****!!! not what i wanted to hear! damnit damnit damnit!
i have a manual, ill read up on it tomorrow while i do nothing at work..

and im guessing the majority of those problems are costly fixes... ****
 
  #17  
Old 07-19-2007, 12:41 AM
Join Date: May 2006
Location: YES THAT IS A 900 ENGINE IN A F2 ON SPRAY
Posts: 1,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: beating a dead horse GAS question

brown smoke--
main jet clogged or too small
fuel flow insufficent
carb intake manifold loose
air cleaner poorly seated

black smoke-
air cleaner clogged
main jet too large or loose
choke stuck
fuel level too high--floats
inlet needle held off needle seat
 
  #18  
Old 07-19-2007, 12:55 AM
Join Date: May 2006
Location: YES THAT IS A 900 ENGINE IN A F2 ON SPRAY
Posts: 1,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: beating a dead horse GAS question

i would say to ride that tank out and fill up somewhere else and see what happens... or add some sea foam or fuel treatment and see what happens.
 
  #19  
Old 07-19-2007, 05:14 AM
Blue Fox's Avatar
Retired Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Las Cruces, NM
Posts: 4,697
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: beating a dead horse GAS question

Not meaning to thread jack........but I've noticed this lately. I like keeping track of my MPG, and I recently switched back over from Shell to Philips 66. I found that Shell (clear) gives me less gas milage than Philips 66 (yellowish color). I have no idea what makes it yellow in color, but it always seems that if I get a tank of yellow gas, I get better milage with no difference in performance.

Anyone else notice, or is this just me paying far too much attention to the little things.
 
  #20  
Old 07-19-2007, 05:56 AM
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location:
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: beating a dead horse GAS question

you sure that's not urine? urine burns a lot cleaner and more efficiently, resulting in a slight power increase and notable increases in gas mileage. i've started brewing my own fuel lately - the yellower and cloudier it is, the higher the energy density, and the more efficiently your engine will run.

:P but seriously, i wonder what the difference is. i know a lot of gas station clerks and owners and stuff (i'm a vendor for autotrader so i chat with them), and i'm told that the "premium" gasolines (shell, chevron, et al) have detergent additives, and the cheaper gasolines (QT, racetrac, conoco phillips, et al) do not. i don't know if this is true or if it's all hype, but that could make a difference.
 


Quick Reply: beating a dead horse GAS question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:25 AM.