vertically challenged
#11
RE: vertically challenged
I'm 5'5" and I just lean. At first it was a little weird but its second nature to me now. I would definitely advise against lowereing the bike. Honda pays people loads of money to set the geometry of these bikes up, why would you want to mess with that?
Plus, leaning is free!
Plus, leaning is free!
#12
RE: vertically challenged
ORIGINAL: doncollins
I'm 6' and touch flat foot on both sides. Guess it's more of a inseam thing, I"m 33" in jeans.
I'd rather use the leaning method than lower the bike. But I guess you have to do what's comfortable for you.
I'm 6' and touch flat foot on both sides. Guess it's more of a inseam thing, I"m 33" in jeans.
I'd rather use the leaning method than lower the bike. But I guess you have to do what's comfortable for you.
Or all of the above could be BS, because I don't know the seat heights in comparison to each other lol. Although I do know sitting on a gixxer feels like wearing a thong.
And yeah, moving my bike in and out of a parking spot usually means moving my bike with me off it, which is no big deal. I don't have any motivation wanting to be able to back my bike out sitting on it lol.
#13
RE: vertically challenged
Any of you guys ever heard of or tried seat shaving? I know one of my buddies who found a website just for vertically challenged sport bike riders who did all sorts of **** to get it the right height. The smallest of small were like 4'8" and the tallest were only 5'5" i believe.
#15
RE: vertically challenged
I can get the ***** of my feet down or my heels down but not both heh... I lean at stops but I just get off if I have to back up any significant distance.. (5'10" 32" inseam).
Overall I like the height of the bike. It makes it easy to stretch out a bit without scraping boots when you're cruising on the highway.
Overall I like the height of the bike. It makes it easy to stretch out a bit without scraping boots when you're cruising on the highway.
#16
RE: vertically challenged
i use the one foot method. with both feet i can only get the palms of my feet (if that makes any sense) to touch the floor. but i still find it easier just to put one foot (left foot) on the floor while the other is on the rear brake at stops. i have always been told that the bike is meant to be at that height and that's the way they built it. so i'll just adjust my riding rather than adjusting the bike. plus it makes me a little bit more familiar w/ the bike knowing how it performs... but i guess if you're really that short then, maybe lowering links are the way to go. who knows? it's anyone's preference right?
#17
RE: vertically challenged
ORIGINAL: ampfp
mine was lowered an inch when I got it, and it used to bottom out on speed bumps [:@]
The suspension was soft... so you have to stiffen it.
I think the only 2 issues for vertically challenged people are: 1> moving the bike back while on it 2> coming to a stop with lean on the unexpected side i.e. you plan to stop with left foot down but bike tips to right.
mine was lowered an inch when I got it, and it used to bottom out on speed bumps [:@]
The suspension was soft... so you have to stiffen it.
I think the only 2 issues for vertically challenged people are: 1> moving the bike back while on it 2> coming to a stop with lean on the unexpected side i.e. you plan to stop with left foot down but bike tips to right.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post