F4i - Main Forum Main F4i discussion board

Sportrider Performance numbers for RR and F4i

Old Aug 8, 2010 | 03:19 PM
  #1  
Resuringu's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Default Sportrider Performance numbers for RR and F4i

I was checking out the numbers on sportrider.com, it looks like the RR has about 7 more horsepower and 2lb's more torque for '06, but in the 60-80 and 80-100 test, the RR did each 2 seconds faster. That can't be right? It can't possibly take me over 5 seconds to go from 60-80 as their numbers indicate, and no way the RR is almost twice as fast accelerating at those speeds. Did they post it wrong? Sorry if this has already been asked, didn't see anything on the search.
 
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2010 | 03:39 PM
  #2  
vangill's Avatar
July 2010 ROTM
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,150
Likes: 0
From: arkansas
Default

yeah, it might not be right, but it doesnt matter,
just ride and have fun
 
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2010 | 01:34 PM
  #3  
Captlombardi's Avatar
Member
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Default

there's a lot more to it than hp and tq differences i would imagine. are the transmission ratios and sprocket sizes the same on the RR vs f4i? the RR may also be more aerodynamic. anyway i agree with vangill, just get out and ride.
 
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2010 | 01:54 PM
  #4  
Sick97SS's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 901
Likes: 1
From: Baltimore Maryland
Default

Get a buddy with a RR and do the 60-80 test yourself.
 
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2010 | 08:44 PM
  #5  
JOECBR600F4i's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 103
Likes: 3
From: Oxnard, CA
Default

Not sure about the '06 but when the RR's first arrived on the scene the F4i's had quicker strait line times and the RR's owned the track times. I am sure as RR's become more of the focus the margin flopped and the RR grew some.
Either way as mentioned above have fun and get out and ride
 
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2010 | 09:18 PM
  #6  
Resuringu's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Default

I guess I'm wondering for two reasons, first it seems like with similar HP and torque numbers, such a difference in acceleration would either be from different mapping (ie. get a powercommander and greatly improve performance) or gearing. Second, while I understand it doesn't matter for someone only riding on the street, I've been doing more and more track days lately and am wondering whether I should put some money into making the bike a little better on the track (ie. suspension and brake upgrades) or cut my losses and get a bike more suited to the track. If the RR truly is double the acceleration from 60-80 and 80-100, it would be fairly hard to ever ride competitively on an F4i on the track unless there is a fix that brings those closer together. I hope that makes sense .

-Brandon
 
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2010 | 10:09 PM
  #7  
vangill's Avatar
July 2010 ROTM
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,150
Likes: 0
From: arkansas
Default

from what ive heard on the track its more about the rider

the only major thing i could think of is that the 06 rr has inverted forks, radial brakes, and the prolink rear suspension. yes its more aimed for the track, by a lot.
but if youre only worried about 60-80 and 80-100 times, i would imagine that in real life with you on each bike your times will be pretty much the same.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
scutfargas
CBR 600F2
4
Jul 2, 2010 03:12 PM
Leveltwo
Off Topic
5
Oct 8, 2008 05:43 PM
CBRrider01
F4i - Main Forum
0
Jun 11, 2007 02:06 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:18 AM.