Chain
which one of these RK chains are the best? : 520XSO, GB520XSO, 520GXW or GB520GXW
what is the naming convention RK uses, like is the GB in front the better line or are they all the same?
also, i believe these chains are for a -1/0 conversion, what size of chain would i need if i have a -1/+2 conversion?
what is the naming convention RK uses, like is the GB in front the better line or are they all the same?
also, i believe these chains are for a -1/0 conversion, what size of chain would i need if i have a -1/+2 conversion?
ORIGINAL: Tahoe SC
why RK?
i suggest trying DID...
they're not a very well known company and their chains haven't been tried or tested or anything.
DUDE>>>>DID!!!!
why RK?
i suggest trying DID...
they're not a very well known company and their chains haven't been tried or tested or anything.
DUDE>>>>DID!!!!
RK chains are good stuff, not proced bad either. DiD is about the best there is tho. And on the naming, I think thats O-ring, x-ring, and gold but not sure at all about it lol.
I put an RK on my bike with a 520 conversion -1 in the front, and I have had it over a year now. I have had no problems, just regular maintenance, lubing and adjusting any slack as time goes on. The 520 is lighter, the 525 is stock and the 530 is designed for bikes with bigger engines.
RK....the XSO is X ring, I always have put a 520 or 525 XSO on my bikes depended on which bike it was...never a problem...last bike had over 15,000miles on the stock chain....DuPont Teflon Lube....


