F4i - Main Forum Main F4i discussion board

Any downside to running 93 octane?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 06-14-2009, 10:16 AM
teko1020's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bluej511
Yea i think some of you guys are just stupid (no offense though). Yes it was designed to run on 87 and yes its tuned for it, but honestly whats it cost everytime you fill up the bike an extra 20cents or wtv? Have you guys seen how much gunk 87-89 octane form? You're not paying for the higher octane but for the additives in the fuel and idk about you guys but ive been putting 93 in my car (91 required) and i have absolutely no gunk on my valves, on my pistons, on anything and its got 156k miles.

Putting higher octane in your motorcycle isnt a bad thing and wasting money, its like putting sea foam or fuel injector cleaner in your gas tank.

We did a test at work where we took 2 brand new crown victorias (designed to run on 87 or E85, which btw is 100-105 octane), we ran one on super and one on regular. Not only did the super run better but it kept the injectors and valves and fuel pump and filter so much cleaner. This was only done to 36k miles too.
Wait... So 87/89 octane doesn't have additives? That's news to me.
 
  #12  
Old 06-14-2009, 10:47 AM
bluej511's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location:
Posts: 994
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Not as much as 91-93, hell you can even run 105 octane if you want and be perfectly fine, thats just really a waste of money. Never seen the commercials for shell super huh with nitrogen?
 
  #13  
Old 06-14-2009, 10:49 AM
teko1020's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You can also run 87 octane and be perfectly fine. Seeing as that is what the engineers over at Honda designed the bike to run on.
 
  #14  
Old 06-14-2009, 10:52 AM
bluej511's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location:
Posts: 994
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The octane rating is a measure of the resistance of gasoline and other fuels to detonation (engine knocking) in spark-ignition internal combustion engines. High-performance engines typically have higher compression ratios and are therefore more prone to detonation, so they require higher octane fuel. A lower-performance engine will not generally perform better with high-octane fuel, since the compression ratio is fixed by the engine design.

This explains it all, yes and engineers at honda also tell you to change your car oil at 5k miles and your filter at 10k miles. Now are you really doing that? If you are then yes by all means run 87 in your car and bike if you'd like. But why "risk" causing detonation and possibly engine damage by saving a few cents here and there?

You do understand that engineers engineer cars and motorcycle to government specs and regulations right? They don't just do what they want, most cares in Japan are limited to 120mph, just like in France any car modification is illegal.

Most 05+ motorcycles run 91 octane, there not on 87 anymore and for good reason.
 
  #15  
Old 06-14-2009, 10:56 AM
teko1020's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Because I don't risk engine damage? They aren't on 87 any more because they are higher performance bikes. I fail to understand why this is so complicated to understand.
 
  #16  
Old 06-14-2009, 11:00 AM
bluej511's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location:
Posts: 994
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

higher performance bikes? its almost exactly the same engine, dif head, dif bore and stroke they still make comparable hp along with the exact same compression ratio.
 
  #17  
Old 06-14-2009, 11:06 AM
PlayfulGod's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Dalton, GA
Posts: 6,026
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

any harm? no! any real benefit? No!

I run 91 - 93 depending on station in my F4, but its lil stickers said to run 91 in it so lol
 
  #18  
Old 06-14-2009, 11:09 AM
bluej511's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location:
Posts: 994
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

haha playful thats a ron/mon rating though thats equivalent to a 87 octane rating in the US, its funny our bikes in europe run 91-95 but here we use 87. The bikes are identical.
 
  #19  
Old 06-14-2009, 11:09 AM
teko1020's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It's obvious that you require the safety blanket of knowing you pushed 93 instead of 87. Some people don't. And you know what? That's perfectly fine. Don't try to fill someone's head with lies that is looking to save those extra pennies. 87 octane fuel is what the bike was designed for. There isn't going to be any engine damage caused by running 87 and 93. Don't you think after 6 years of production that Honda would have stopped printing 86+ in the manuals if it did? There are still plenty of additives in 87 octane fuel to keep the engine clean. There is no benefit to running 93 instead of 87 in an engine designed for 86+.
 
  #20  
Old 06-14-2009, 11:12 AM
PlayfulGod's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Dalton, GA
Posts: 6,026
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by bluej511
haha playful thats a ron/mon rating though thats equivalent to a 87 octane rating in the US, its funny our bikes in europe run 91-95 but here we use 87. The bikes are identical.
Thats true now I think of it lol. But regardless no harm will been done to our engines from running 93. As someone else said you could even run 105 in em and still no harm would come of it, just a lighter wallet lol.
 


Quick Reply: Any downside to running 93 octane?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:44 PM.