CBR 929 CAMS?
PS - should add, I can't get ANY TWO SOURCES to agree what stock gearing is. My last post is nothing more than a shot at explaining what can happen when you switch fron an even-number sprocket to an odd, and visa versa.
16/43 or 16/42
I think it may depend on year, or manufacture date.
One tooth is going to make very little difference.
if you figure stock speedo is off by approx. 5% high, then putting a 42 tooth on the rear would probably correct most of the error.
I think it may depend on year, or manufacture date.
One tooth is going to make very little difference.
if you figure stock speedo is off by approx. 5% high, then putting a 42 tooth on the rear would probably correct most of the error.
stock it 16/43.
i got a 520 quick kit from sprocketcenter.com for a good deal. gettin that put on tomorrow.
I called the FACTORYPRO autherized tun eshop today and to get my web cams and dyno tuned with Digital 4 Gas exhaust analyzer
for about $650. the guy said the cams alone should get about 7-10 hp, and with the right tunning prolly 10-15 hp.. some where around there .as soon as i get the funds and get it done i will post my base line and tuned dyno sheets. We'll see.
i got a 520 quick kit from sprocketcenter.com for a good deal. gettin that put on tomorrow.
I called the FACTORYPRO autherized tun eshop today and to get my web cams and dyno tuned with Digital 4 Gas exhaust analyzer
for about $650. the guy said the cams alone should get about 7-10 hp, and with the right tunning prolly 10-15 hp.. some where around there .as soon as i get the funds and get it done i will post my base line and tuned dyno sheets. We'll see.
Yeah man, if it is coming apart anyways, get some top end work done. Porting & polish job would be a good idea. You know, for the cost, you could throw on a small turbo & leave the cams alone.
http://www.rrzone.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1583
http://www.rrzone.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1583
DID SOME SAY TURBO!!? WHERE AND HOW MUCH? IS IT A COMPLETE KIT B/C I was looking around a the kit run around $2500/
i would like to ge the head done up but i fig. if i keep the bike i will just find a motor and start fresh. i'm just testing the waters. i've built my 91 civc hatch and the came out pretty good. ant thart took me a better part of 3 years to do. ima take it as a learning proccess..
but bqck to the turbo..... it if any one can share some info on the whole turbo thing i may just do that and try to fly to the moon... j/k..
THANKS TO ALL WHO HAS PUT THEIR 2CENTS IN THE FEEDBACK HAS BEEN A BIG HELP..!
i would like to ge the head done up but i fig. if i keep the bike i will just find a motor and start fresh. i'm just testing the waters. i've built my 91 civc hatch and the came out pretty good. ant thart took me a better part of 3 years to do. ima take it as a learning proccess..
but bqck to the turbo..... it if any one can share some info on the whole turbo thing i may just do that and try to fly to the moon... j/k..
THANKS TO ALL WHO HAS PUT THEIR 2CENTS IN THE FEEDBACK HAS BEEN A BIG HELP..!
Start off reading that post on www.rrzone.com
Mr. Turbo kits are real expensive, like 3 grand expensive...
Getting a smaller ball bearing turbo, and rigging up an intercooler could be done for much less if you have the skills. It might be a little easier on the older 900's, I could see alot of dyno time in your future if you attempted this, custom mapping would be a must. From what I've read, a smaller turbo is better. You could get 30-40hp without stressing out the engine too much.
[IMG]local://upfiles/5496/32ACA9D2097F467CA9F627E6D26843CB.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]local://upfiles/5496/E1836401E9CF4653964BA0CE623D4FD9.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]local://upfiles/5496/1DE8945319CF411290DFF4EDC2BB9F4F.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]local://upfiles/5496/56932941A26E414FBD855B260189A082.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]local://upfiles/5496/737BD46E11B642B69557E12E6BB0B512.jpg[/IMG]
Mr. Turbo kits are real expensive, like 3 grand expensive...
Getting a smaller ball bearing turbo, and rigging up an intercooler could be done for much less if you have the skills. It might be a little easier on the older 900's, I could see alot of dyno time in your future if you attempted this, custom mapping would be a must. From what I've read, a smaller turbo is better. You could get 30-40hp without stressing out the engine too much.
[IMG]local://upfiles/5496/32ACA9D2097F467CA9F627E6D26843CB.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]local://upfiles/5496/E1836401E9CF4653964BA0CE623D4FD9.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]local://upfiles/5496/1DE8945319CF411290DFF4EDC2BB9F4F.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]local://upfiles/5496/56932941A26E414FBD855B260189A082.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]local://upfiles/5496/737BD46E11B642B69557E12E6BB0B512.jpg[/IMG]


