sprockets?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #21  
Old 04-06-2010 | 09:14 PM
johnnyx's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,641
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL
Default

Originally Posted by 77vetteguy
Really? Whats the stock top speed of the 05 rr?

Stock top speed is limited on all Japanese bikes exported to the US and Europe by a speed governor in the CDI that doesn't allow the bike to surpass 186MPH. A stock 2005 cbr600rr is able to achieve speeds right around 160MPH under excellent conditions.
 
  #22  
Old 04-06-2010 | 09:30 PM
77vetteguy's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 107
Likes: 1
From: iowa
Default

Originally Posted by johnnyx
Stock top speed is limited on all Japanese bikes exported to the US and Europe by a speed governor in the CDI that doesn't allow the bike to surpass 186MPH. A stock 2005 cbr600rr is able to achieve speeds right around 160MPH under excellent conditions.
Wow thats weak. My f2 could do 160mph easy. That was with -1 front +1 back.
 

Last edited by 77vetteguy; 04-06-2010 at 09:33 PM.
  #23  
Old 04-06-2010 | 10:06 PM
johnnyx's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,641
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL
Default

Hey, you bought the thing.
 
  #24  
Old 04-07-2010 | 10:24 AM
chuckbear's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 968
Likes: 1
From: Orlando, FL
Default

Originally Posted by 77vetteguy
Wow thats weak. My f2 could do 160mph easy. That was with -1 front +1 back.
160 indicated =/= 160 mph actual

No, no it surely couldn't.
 
  #25  
Old 04-07-2010 | 11:25 AM
philthethrillohio's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
From: cincinnati
Default

yeah my buddy i ride with has a f3 , he swoar he hit 170 and i believe his speedo said that , but that surely is not the actuall speed. go to gearing commander that will clear things up. plus a 600rr stock gearing with little mods will not reach 170.
 
  #26  
Old 04-07-2010 | 11:17 PM
77vetteguy's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 107
Likes: 1
From: iowa
Default

Originally Posted by chuckbear
160 indicated =/= 160 mph actual

No, no it surely couldn't.
It was correct. I used my gps to check the speedometer. off by 2mph. It was just at the beginning of redline at 160. I just expected alittle more out of a newer bike.
 

Last edited by 77vetteguy; 04-07-2010 at 11:23 PM.
  #27  
Old 04-08-2010 | 09:40 AM
Junior2552's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 77vetteguy
It was correct. I used my gps to check the speedometer. off by 2mph. It was just at the beginning of redline at 160. I just expected alittle more out of a newer bike.
I don't think 160 is slow.... how much more did you expect out of a 600cc bike?? They're not made for top end. They're made for quick acceleration. If you want something that's geared longer buy a lamborghini.. or a 1000RR, those top out at about 185..that extra 15mph is really noticeable at those speeds.....
 
  #28  
Old 04-08-2010 | 09:48 AM
Junior2552's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by chuckbear
160 indicated =/= 160 mph actual

No, no it surely couldn't.
+1 to that too... lowering the sprockets didn't make the bikes top end bigger...
 
  #29  
Old 04-08-2010 | 12:14 PM
chuckbear's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 968
Likes: 1
From: Orlando, FL
Default

Originally Posted by 77vetteguy
It was correct. I used my gps to check the speedometer. off by 2mph. It was just at the beginning of redline at 160. I just expected alittle more out of a newer bike.
Sorry dude, there's just no way an F2 with -1/+1 hit 160. Even at redline. Just no. And certainly not "easy".

Going to gearingcommander.com, the stock theoretical top speed is 147.44. With -1/+1 it's 135.22. I don't know what you were doing wrong, or if you just had a cheap GPS (low sample rate, not enough satellites to triangulate accurately, maybe you were going up/down in altitude), but there is just no way.
 

Last edited by chuckbear; 04-08-2010 at 12:28 PM.
  #30  
Old 04-08-2010 | 12:51 PM
77vetteguy's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 107
Likes: 1
From: iowa
Default

Originally Posted by chuckbear
Sorry dude, there's just no way an F2 with -1/+1 hit 160. Even at redline. Just no. And certainly not "easy".

Going to gearingcommander.com, the stock theoretical top speed is 147.44. With -1/+1 it's 135.22. I don't know what you were doing wrong, or if you just had a cheap GPS (low sample rate, not enough satellites to triangulate accurately, maybe you were going up/down in altitude), but there is just no way.
Then my friends stock r1 speedometer was also off. Would you guys like me to get a police radar reed out as proof?
 


Quick Reply: sprockets?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:30 AM.