CBR 600F2 1991 - 1994 CBR 600F2

SV650 vs. CBR600F2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 06-08-2010, 10:27 PM
99sv650n's Avatar
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Richmond VA
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default SV650 vs. CBR600F2

1999 SV650 Naked - LOTS of goodies, SS brakes lines, cruise control bar ends, holeshot exhaust, jet kit, seargent seat, bridgestone BT-016 tires, racetec suspension, regeared lower, frame sliders. GREAT shape. 37,000 Miles.

OR

1993 CBR600F2 Bone stock 6,000 miles. Fairings have a few scratches here and there, rip in seat with tape covering it. Runs good, clip ons seem alittle bent though.

I love both bikes, what do you guys thinK?
 

Last edited by 99sv650n; 06-10-2010 at 10:04 AM.
  #2  
Old 06-09-2010, 02:08 AM
Viking's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Norway
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Same price?
 
  #3  
Old 06-09-2010, 11:22 AM
halffast1g's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 524
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

sv650, dont look back
 
  #4  
Old 06-09-2010, 11:46 AM
jtkardel's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What do you want out of your bike? The SV has a sublime powerplant which is easy to use and supplies plenty of power. It has better brakes than the F2. The stock suspension is unforgivably bad for any bike that purports to have any sporty pretensions. That alone is enough for me not to want one without the full GSXR front end/rear end swap. The more aggressive riding position and inline 4 power help out too. I don't think you can go too wrong with either though.
 
  #5  
Old 06-09-2010, 01:10 PM
JesseAwesome's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Oregon / 503
Posts: 743
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The SV650 will retain it's resale value better, and is a better bike for more intermediate riders. As far as it's bad suspension... it compares fine to the F2 suspension.

I just can't stand riding without fairings. It's ugly, and uncomfortable at high speeds.
 
  #6  
Old 06-09-2010, 05:32 PM
jtkardel's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JesseAwesome
As far as it's bad suspension... it compares fine to the F2 suspension.
The '99 SV front end is absolute garbage. No adjustable and super soft. It feels like an EX250. It's great for commuting but it is awful when actually pushing it. It's definitely not as good as the stock F2, even with the stock F2's fairly soft damping rod front end.
 
  #7  
Old 06-09-2010, 07:52 PM
JesseAwesome's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Oregon / 503
Posts: 743
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Interesting. The SV650's I've seen I guess are all overhauled. They've all got pre-load, rebound, and dampening.
 
  #8  
Old 06-10-2010, 10:00 AM
99sv650n's Avatar
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Richmond VA
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well as I said in the first post I have racetec suspension LOL. So the suspension (racetec) is far better than the F2's actually. I would agree that the stock suspension on the SV sucks, thats why I went to the racetec. Heres the scenario, the SV is my bike that I have owned for years. Last week the shift lever broke on a down shift so while I am waiting for the part to fix it, my friend let me borrow his F2. I heard he is interested in selling it so I was thinking about making an offer. The offer would be for like 1500? I think I could get atleast 2 for the SV. I like the 100hp of the F2, but I also like the power delievery and low-midrange of the SV. I think the F2 sounds a little better and the fairings make it more comfortable on the interstate, but around town the upright seating position make the SV more comfortable. Insurance is very comparable on the two bikes, (50 more per YEAR for the F2). So now knowing all that, what do you guys think?
 
  #9  
Old 06-10-2010, 10:11 AM
SteewDK's Avatar
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The F2 is definitly more 'Tom Cruise' than the Sv650
 
  #10  
Old 06-10-2010, 10:22 AM
bubba_finch07's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 880
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I say keep the SV. Id upgrade the fairings may put some GSXR fairings on it.
 


Quick Reply: SV650 vs. CBR600F2



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:58 AM.