some questions
my personal experience is that I get a marginally better running engine when I run premium as opposed to middle grade. Though I will note that when I run premium its from mobil so its not an ethanol blend. But the times I've bought middle grade its from the co-op which is a 10% blend. Like I said, the difference is nominal, but its enough for me to justify the cost. I agree with FNquickF2.
If the difference between grades is 10 cents and I'm only buying 3 gallons, the cost difference is pretty miniscule. I'd rather spend the two extra quarters for my marginally better performance than deal with anything that may affect the longevity of my engine.
If the difference between grades is 10 cents and I'm only buying 3 gallons, the cost difference is pretty miniscule. I'd rather spend the two extra quarters for my marginally better performance than deal with anything that may affect the longevity of my engine.
I second elmer's notion. I run 91 octane (premium in Ca) just because of predetonation. I'm pretty sure our motors have high compression ratios which require higher octane gas than 87 or 89. I mean, if you were using a 1990 bmw 325i with a 2.5 liter engine with a compression ratio of 8:5:1, using 87 octane is your best bet (My car). But other than that, bikes = high compression = high octane = cleaner burn = less probability of predetonation = more reliable.
Cheers.
-Jasper
Cheers.
-Jasper
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



