Harley VROD
#13
#16
RE: Harley VROD
From Motorcyclist's website: 11.3 for the V-rod in the quarter, 109 MEASURED HP
Harley-Davidson
motorcycle measured hp (@ rpm) measured torque (lp. - ft. @ rpm) corrected quarter-mile* (sec. @ mph) top-gear roll-ons 60-80 mph* (sec.) wet weight (lb.) ergos** last tested
S.E. Road Glide ('00) 70.8 @ 5250 86.4 @ 2750 13.93 @ 93.1 6.71 828 5/00
V-Rod ('02) 109.3 @ 8250 74.3 @ 7000 11.31 @ 115.0 4.05 620 24.7/30.1/14.4 4/02
Sportster 1200 Roadster ('04) 674.4 @ 6000 72.2 @ 3750 13.02 @ 100.03 5.11 584 12/04
Harley-Davidson
motorcycle measured hp (@ rpm) measured torque (lp. - ft. @ rpm) corrected quarter-mile* (sec. @ mph) top-gear roll-ons 60-80 mph* (sec.) wet weight (lb.) ergos** last tested
S.E. Road Glide ('00) 70.8 @ 5250 86.4 @ 2750 13.93 @ 93.1 6.71 828 5/00
V-Rod ('02) 109.3 @ 8250 74.3 @ 7000 11.31 @ 115.0 4.05 620 24.7/30.1/14.4 4/02
Sportster 1200 Roadster ('04) 674.4 @ 6000 72.2 @ 3750 13.02 @ 100.03 5.11 584 12/04
#17
RE: Harley VROD
you know this got my attention so i had to step in an say NO WAY would a v-rod even come close. it's harley's numbers they use not what I have seen with my own eyes at the track and street. a good and I mean good driver can get one heck of a take off with a v-rod and then it's all over for it. they just don't move like they claim.
#18
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post