CBR 1000F "Hurricane" 1987-1996 CBR 1000F

Best Gearing For Highway Use

Old Oct 4, 2009 | 01:28 AM
  #1  
Aussie Johnno's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Ride of the Year ... Just Ask The Boys
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne, Australia
Default Best Gearing For Highway Use

All,

Just finished rebuilding the front end of my project bike, it is now time to turn my attention to the rear.
New chain and sprockets are on my list but i would like to drop the rpm's at highway speed, what's recommended?
Will a 18t counter make much difference and will it fit?

Thanks in advance

Aussie Johnno
 
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2009 | 09:17 AM
  #2  
Shadow's Avatar
Redcoat, & Maxwell's Silver Hammer, MVN and curmudgeon
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 11,608
Likes: 5
From: Mud hut, Zululand
Default

18 fill fit but you have to modify the chain guard/something.
Rather stay with the 17 front and come down to, say a 40 rear from 42.Much less work.
 
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2009 | 10:07 AM
  #3  
kilgoretrout's Avatar
Administrator - Retired
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,194
Likes: 6
From: PA, USA
Default

18 fill fit but you have to modify the chain guard/something.
Rather stay with the 17 front and come down to, say a 40 rear from 42.Much less work.
100% agree. I would just come down a couple in the rear.
 
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2009 | 05:39 PM
  #5  
woot's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,127
Likes: 1
From: NS, Canada
Default

You can do the math to find out what the % change would be.

Compare the stock ratio to the modified ratio - and then compare those fractions. It will give you a percent. A 10% change (FOR EXAMPLE) means that at 5000 rpm you'd be 500 rpm lower rpm than before.

Also note that Honda generally knew what they were doing - the question was, what was honda doing?
 
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2009 | 05:48 PM
  #7  
kilgoretrout's Avatar
Administrator - Retired
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,194
Likes: 6
From: PA, USA
Default

We used to have a chart and everything for that calc, woot. Can't remember where it went, though...
Edit: Here's the ratio chart. Don't have a calc chart, but maybe I'll make one?
 

Last edited by kilgoretrout; Oct 4, 2009 at 06:00 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2009 | 05:59 PM
  #8  
woot's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,127
Likes: 1
From: NS, Canada
Default



I have an excel spreadsheet that I made.

Old_f = 16
Old_r = 46

New_f = 15
New_r = 48

(aka -1,+2)

OLD_ratio = Old_F / Old_R = 0.347826087

New_ratio = New_F / New_R = 0.3125

Change_Ratio = New_Ratio / Old_Ratio = 0.8984375

or the new ratio is 89.8% as tall, OR

Change_Ratio -1 = -0.1015625

Which means - 10.1% shorter (shorter because it is negative in this case)


For your bike the change will be a positive %, or Taller
 
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2009 | 06:04 PM
  #9  
kilgoretrout's Avatar
Administrator - Retired
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,194
Likes: 6
From: PA, USA
Default

Very nice, woot!!
 
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2009 | 09:51 AM
  #10  
dietDrThunder's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
Default

It's funny, every big streetbike I've ever had I wanted taller gearing for hwy riding...except this one. I find the stock gearing to be perfect. The motor (on my bike anyway) has a few RPM zones that are pretty buzzy, but it smooths right out at an indicated 82 indicated (75 in reality), up to about 88 indicated. I like to cruise in this speed zone because it minimizes tickets but I still feel like I'm getting somewhere; probably because even though I know it's wrong, seeing 85 on the speedo feels like progress

I do understand that some peeps like to cruise faster than that, so in that case, I think 2 teeth will serve you well. Beyond that you're gonna be shifting a lot more. I love this bike...one of my favorites ever, and it does many things well including decent midrange torque...doesn't have much bottom for a liter bike though.
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:49 AM.