No Muffler.. Bad?
#11
06-29-2007, 12:21 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Scottsburg,In/DaytonaBch,Fl
Posts: 5,248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: No Muffler.. Bad?
ORIGINAL: baxsom
you void the warranty as soon as you put an aftermarket exhaust or pc3 on the bike, or disable the PAIR.
ORIGINAL: Blue Fox
+1. EXACTLY! (and +1 to the neighbors hating you too.)
Not to mention, you just voided your warranty entirely.
ORIGINAL: Triax
He's correct you will burn your valves up and loose horsepower. The engine needs a certain amount of backpressure to work and preform properly. So I would suggest dealing the factory pipe until you can afford a slip on exhaust.
He's correct you will burn your valves up and loose horsepower. The engine needs a certain amount of backpressure to work and preform properly. So I would suggest dealing the factory pipe until you can afford a slip on exhaust.
Not to mention, you just voided your warranty entirely.
#13
06-29-2007, 06:23 PM
RE: No Muffler.. Bad?
ORIGINAL: D2DGraphix_600RR
Not if a dealership installs them who is certified.
ORIGINAL: baxsom
you void the warranty as soon as you put an aftermarket exhaust or pc3 on the bike, or disable the PAIR.
ORIGINAL: Blue Fox
+1. EXACTLY! (and +1 to the neighbors hating you too.)
Not to mention, you just voided your warranty entirely.
ORIGINAL: Triax
He's correct you will burn your valves up and loose horsepower. The engine needs a certain amount of backpressure to work and preform properly. So I would suggest dealing the factory pipe until you can afford a slip on exhaust.
He's correct you will burn your valves up and loose horsepower. The engine needs a certain amount of backpressure to work and preform properly. So I would suggest dealing the factory pipe until you can afford a slip on exhaust.
Not to mention, you just voided your warranty entirely.
not to mention that aftermaket pipes violate EPA noise regualtions. every single one of them
i have one for my 1000 yes but i also kept the oem exhaust in case i move somewhere that the inspection tech actually looks for those things.
#14
06-29-2007, 06:35 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Scottsburg,In/DaytonaBch,Fl
Posts: 5,248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#15
07-04-2007, 11:27 AM
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Indy by way of CT and PA
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: No Muffler.. Bad?
The engineers who make these bikes design them with exhausts for a reason.Most engines will require some type of exhaust for the backpressurealone. For the general public who like to modify, great, do what you will. But no exhaut anywhere but a track is loud and obnoxious.
#16
07-04-2007, 04:21 PM
#17
07-04-2007, 06:27 PM
Retired Moderator ans All Around Good Guy
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,859
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: No Muffler.. Bad?
apparently these are the results
ORIGINAL: 1BadCBR07
It's loud and deep!!! And no popping/backfiring...The whole powerband shows an increase in throttle response.. +2mph on top end (different factors may also play into this).. Losing the factory exhaust really shaved off some weight.. Ran a '07 GSXR600 tonight with this current set-up and man I handed him his @$$ on a silver platter... Still cannot quite keep up with the 750's though...
DH
It's loud and deep!!! And no popping/backfiring...The whole powerband shows an increase in throttle response.. +2mph on top end (different factors may also play into this).. Losing the factory exhaust really shaved off some weight.. Ran a '07 GSXR600 tonight with this current set-up and man I handed him his @$$ on a silver platter... Still cannot quite keep up with the 750's though...
DH
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
