600 Modifications This section is specifically for questions and advice pertaining to mods of the current 600 models.

K&N: anyone heard of this?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 13, 2008 | 06:17 PM
  #11  
wally28_osu's Avatar
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, Ohio
Default RE: K&N: anyone heard of this?

I have been running a K&N air filter for two years now in my bike with no problems. It was actually recommended by many for better air flow than the stock. It's also nice to be able to take out and clean and put back in...dont hav to buy another filter. It pays for itself with that respect.
 
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2008 | 06:37 PM
  #12  
wellarmedCr@cker's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
From: Callahan, Florida
Default RE: K&N: anyone heard of this?

Go with BMC or stick with the OEM.
 
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2008 | 02:46 PM
  #13  
Wakcbr's Avatar
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: K&N: anyone heard of this?

I think it's because aftermarket filters are not design specifically for the engine or sensors for the engine. Running oiled type air filters can ruin sensors in the intake and cause problems. And of course, the dealer would not take chances of running with aftermarket filters.
 
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2008 | 02:52 PM
  #14  
ffingers's Avatar
Registered Users
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,360
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL (downtown)
Default RE: K&N: anyone heard of this?

i am pretty sure they won't ruin sensors in the intake....it's more because these bikes are tuned for a precise air flow and the stock filter gives that....you go aftermarket that either restricts or increases air flow, you need to mess with the FI to compensate and most people don't....you can look here on the board though, a ton of people run an aftermarket filter without a tune so it isn't gonna destroy you, but you are likely not getting an increase and in some cases might be decreasing HP....

if what you are suggesting were true, racebikes would need different intake sensors...i doubt they intake sensors are all that different from stock, as they are just sensors, what changes is that the FI is specifically mapped to compensate for a drastic change in air flow..
 
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2008 | 11:02 AM
  #15  
Brandon77's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,082
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: K&N: anyone heard of this?

K&N is the shiz
 
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2008 | 08:43 PM
  #16  
skitzofrenzy's Avatar
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
From: 916 sacramento, california
Default RE: K&N: anyone heard of this?

k&n is the the shiz . i want one so bad... but i wont get one until i can afford it and a pcIII. that way i can get a map for it and my pipe and therefore have all the right air to fuel ratio that is needed.


that, ladies and gents, is how you do it
 
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2008 | 07:35 PM
  #17  
rolandk's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
From: Portland, Oregon
Default RE: K&N: anyone heard of this?

I run K&N air filters in every vehicleI own and never had a problem. Also run a K&Noil filter on my F4i.

I thought the knock on them is they flow MORE air, providing less filtration and the possiblitity of sucking debris in your engine.
 
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2008 | 08:09 PM
  #18  
PlayfulGod's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,026
Likes: 2
From: Dalton, GA
Default RE: K&N: anyone heard of this?

ORIGINAL: rolandk

I run K&N air filters in every vehicleI own and never had a problem. Also run a K&Noil filter on my F4i.

I thought the knock on them is they flow MORE air, providing less filtration and the possiblitity of sucking debris in your engine.
Now this is a possibility IF it isnt cleaned & recharged like it should be.
 
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2008 | 08:16 PM
  #19  
Onarom's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,284
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: K&N: anyone heard of this?

Personally, I have heard too many bad with the good for me to go with K&N. K&N have been shown to actually decrease hp in the 1000RR. Personally, I would go with BMC. In reallity, I am still with my stock filter.
 
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2008 | 08:21 PM
  #20  
PlayfulGod's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,026
Likes: 2
From: Dalton, GA
Default RE: K&N: anyone heard of this?

ORIGINAL: Onarom

Personally, I have heard too many bad with the good for me to go with K&N. K&N have been shown to actually decrease hp in the 1000RR. Personally, I would go with BMC. In reallity, I am still with my stock filter.
I'm willing to bet the bad dyno results were from ppl who didnt like K&N to start with.

K&N's have flowed better on everything I have ever installed them on. And that list ranges from VW powered sand rails (open system), street bajas(open system), street bugs, small block chevys, and a few diff bikes.

And I think if they decreased performance they would have stopped selling them LONG ago or corrected any issues with their filters. Hell I never heard of BMC until last year so...
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:38 AM.