CBR 600F3 1995 - 1998 CBR 600F3 Forum

1998 f3 vs. 2003 rr

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 23, 2009 | 05:35 PM
  #21  
willduce's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 605
Likes: 0
From: northern il
Default

i know for a fact that my 98 f3 runs like a bitch, but i also know that ive ridden a friends 06 RR and its worlds faster than mine. i cant see how its possible for this to be true unless you are racing some talentless hack who should be on a vespa not a race bike. the difference ive experienced first hand leads me to know for a fact that a 600rr will destroy a f3. im siding with Juliet
 
Reply
Old May 23, 2009 | 07:32 PM
  #22  
Juliet's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,127
Likes: 11
From: United Kindgdom
Default

Originally Posted by willduce
i know for a fact that my 98 f3 runs like a bitch, but i also know that ive ridden a friends 06 RR and its worlds faster than mine. i cant see how its possible for this to be true unless you are racing some talentless hack who should be on a vespa not a race bike. the difference ive experienced first hand leads me to know for a fact that a 600rr will destroy a f3. im siding with Juliet

thank you for siding with me but the others all do have a point .. a well set up 97/98 F3, that is running as it left the factory as mine does, is a good fast bike and worlds away from my old F2s, BUT

as I said the later 2007 onwards RR is a world apart again from these bikes ... however, stick a complete numpty on my RR who doesn't know how and when to change gear or doesn't understand the basics of counter steering and I will destroy him/her with my F3 ..so yes, all things being equal the new RR is a whole new ball game but like anything whether it be a car or a bike, a crap driver/rider in/on one and the stig in/on the other and that is the real difference ..lol

Jules
 
Reply
Old May 24, 2009 | 10:03 AM
  #23  
Heffer2586's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
From: Mexico, ME
Default

Just soo everyone knows we started from a 65mph roll. And i am still not convinced, i said that it was a 2003 not a 2007, and i still believe that my 98 will beat the 2003's along with anyone else that has tried this. Yes i believe that the 2007 will blow my fairings off, no doubt about that, i would still try though.
 
Reply
Old May 24, 2009 | 03:20 PM
  #24  
Juliet's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,127
Likes: 11
From: United Kindgdom
Default

You may well be right, especially in a roll on from that speed, my own F3 is very fast and has excellent top gear acceleration ... it always amazed me how well it pulled in top, then I did read the early 2003/4 RRs had low and mid range weakness, so if they were out of the power zone then quite possibly you can walk away from one ... I would still imagine equal riders through the gears would be different but then it's only mere seconds isn't it ... all I can tell you for certain is my own new RR is incredible after my F3 and kills it on acceleration everywhere ... even just snapping my throttle open at 5-6,000 rpm in top has the RR surging forward much harder than my F3 could ever manage :-)

Jules
 
Reply
Old May 25, 2009 | 09:13 PM
  #25  
Heffer2586's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
From: Mexico, ME
Default

Thanks for the imput everyone it has beena great topic for a week or 2. Have fun ridin this summer. No matter what you ride its always fun.
 
Reply
Old May 26, 2009 | 12:48 AM
  #26  
DonDDR's Avatar
Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: Oregon
Default

So what you are saying is a RC211 GP bike is better than a 10 yr old F series CBR?
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tomsaab
New Member Area
3
May 9, 2011 06:31 AM
dustinj
Sights 'N Sounds
9
Nov 7, 2010 12:17 AM
closekd
CBR 600F3
1
Apr 21, 2008 12:59 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:59 AM.