Even if it was, you don't resist police officers. You will always lose. Take them to court if your rights were seriously infringed upon.


Edit: why are we debating this? This is at least 2 months old now and still just as stupid.

 

haha you must be a cop....

what do you mean play? he asked a question? #2 patriot act blah blah.. who cares..

no one rides for free? thats why we pay taxes just like you.. so if i want to ask anyone a question in public i have that right. and i have the right not to be tazed bro.. lol

 

I'm talking about them arresting him in the first place not about his resistance.

 

hahaha
he says
ow... ow.... ow... ow.... ow... ow...
hah

 

This is how America should be.

 

+1

 

Here you go.

 

[/quote]

It is a abuse of power. The dude did do ANYTHING wrong. All he did was ask a question which is perfectly LEGAL.

[/quote]

It is called trespassing. If you are asked to leave and refuse to do so you are trespassing. When the officer puts his hands on you and you pull away, no that is resist arrest. When you have 5 officers attempting to effect the arrest without hurting the bumbling idiot, then the best use of force option would be the tazer. A 5 second burst and he was cuffed. If he had been pepper sprayed it would be 45 minutes of screeming and snot everywhere and it would have looked a lot worse. The officers were doing their job.

 

Seriously dude? This was a public form and he was not "asked" to leave. Its not trespassing.

 

[ORIGINAL: cwmc29



"It is called trespassing. If you are asked to leave and refuse to do so you are trespassing. When the officer puts his hands on you and you pull away, no that is resist arrest. When you have 5 officers attempting to effect the arrest without hurting the bumbling idiot, then the best use of force option would be the tazer. A 5 second burst and he was cuffed. If he had been pepper sprayed it would be 45 minutes of screeming and snot everywhere and it would have looked a lot worse. The officers were doing their job. "


wrong, wrong, mc wrongywrong.. he has a right to be there just like those cops...


here is the law that the police were supposed to be enforcing, and should have detained anyone who asked that boy to be removed as it is in violation of the following "open meetings law"

yes this is NY's copy, but everystate has one and they are all the same with minor exceptions.

chew on it


PUBLIC OFFICERS LAW, ARTICLE 7
OPEN MEETINGS LAW
Section 100. Legislative declaration.
101. Short title.
102. Definitions.
103. Open meetings and executive sessions.
104. Public notice.
105. Conduct of executive sessions.
106. Minutes
107. Enforcement.
108. Exemptions
109. Committee on open government.
110. Construction with other laws.
111. Severability.
ยง100. Legislative declaration. It is essential to the maintenance of a democratic society that the public business be performed in an open and public manner and that the citizens of this state be fully aware of and able to observe the performance of public officials and attend and listen to the deliberations and decisions that go into the making of public policy. The people must be able to remain informed if they are to retain control over those who are their public servants. It is the only climate under which the commonweal will prosper and enable the governmental process to operate for the benefit of those who created it.
ยง101. Short title. This article shall be known and may be cited as "Open Meetings Law".
ยง102. Definitions. As used in this article: 1. "Meeting" means the official convening of a public body for the purpose of conducting public business, including the use of videoconferencing for attendance and participation by the members of the public body. 2. "Public body" means any entity, for which a quorum is required in order to conduct public business and which consists of two or more members, performing a governmental function for the state or for an agency or department thereof, or for a public corporation as defined in section sixty-six of the general construction law, or committee or subcommittee or other similar body of such public body. 3. "Executive session" means that portion of a meeting not open to the general public.
ยง103. Open meetings and executive sessions. (a) Every meeting of a public body shall be open to the general public, except that an executive session of such body may be called and business transacted thereat in accordance with section one hundred five of this article. (b) Public bodies shall make or cause to be made all reasonable efforts to ensure that meetings are held in facilities that permit barrier-free physical access to the physically handicapped, as defined in subdivision five of section fifty of the public buildings law. (c) A public body that uses videoconferencing to conduct its meetings shall provide an opportunity to attend, listen and observe at any site at which a member participates.
[font="times new roman"]ยง104. Public notice. 1. Public notice of the time and place of a