Off Topic A place for you CBR junkies to boldly go off topic. Almost anything goes.

Stock CBR F4i Vs Stock 94-98 Mustang Gt

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 21, 2011 | 11:49 AM
  #1  
xxreaper487's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
From: Hell
Default Stock CBR F4i Vs Stock 94-98 Mustang Gt

No longer about stories I guess, but talking about cars themselves. Awesome guys keep it going!
 

Last edited by xxreaper487; Apr 26, 2011 at 09:51 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2011 | 12:41 PM
  #2  
txsmainevent's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,395
Likes: 0
Default

Stock CBR F4i Vs. Stock 94-98 Mustang Gt
Stock f4i huh? then i look at the sig section and you have muzzy exhaust and wiseco piston kit......

And to answer your question, why entertain them?
 
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2011 | 12:54 PM
  #3  
__Z__'s Avatar
April 2011 Ride of the Month
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,686
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by txsmainevent
Stock f4i huh? then i look at the sig section and you have muzzy exhaust and wiseco piston kit......

And to answer your question, why entertain them?
lol sig. fail hahahah
 
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2011 | 12:56 PM
  #4  
xxreaper487's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
From: Hell
Default

lol...the exhaust is only a slip on..not going to make a difference in power and you're right...not exactly stock with the piston kit installed..if it is installed. I bought it as it is and i dont know 100% if it was installed or not. I havent noticed much of a power difference compared to the other 600 i had. I look at is pretty much stock.

and i did it to entertain myself..not just for him.
 
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2011 | 12:57 PM
  #5  
xxreaper487's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
From: Hell
Default

it seems stock to me. wasn't trying to hide anything lol
 
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2011 | 12:58 PM
  #6  
billetproof97's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
From: wichita falls, texas
Default

Those 4.6l are slow as *****.
 
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2011 | 02:46 PM
  #7  
Krux's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 731
Likes: 1
From: Saint Paul Minnesota
Default

Originally Posted by billetproof97
Those 4.6l are slow as *****.
What you mean to say is the non svt 4.6l are slow as *****. The svt with minor mods pushes mid to high 400s easily.
 
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2011 | 03:24 PM
  #8  
billetproof97's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
From: wichita falls, texas
Default

Ok wanna get technical 94-95 were the last years of the 5.0L motors 96-98 has th slow *** 4.6l. Hell even the 99-03 4.6 are slow. Those cobra 4.6 are hard to come by since I see kids driving the **** outta them. Those 05+ are doing well though. Performance wise.
 
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2011 | 03:37 PM
  #9  
andyriot's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 242
Likes: 1
From: FL
Default

 
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2011 | 04:00 PM
  #10  
nickp123's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 805
Likes: 1
From: NJ
Default

the early sn-95s sucked. the new edge ones after 98 were way better and made more power. you cant say the 03-04 cobras are slow as ***** they run mid 12s stock. Anything can be fast with the right amount of work and money. BUt there are a bunch of retards that think theyre badass just because theyre in a mustang and dont realize theyre tools. But yeah those pre 99 gt's arent impressive they only made like 200 at the wheel.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:12 PM.