Question...
^^^
There isnt a clear definition it harks back to the days of steam engines and equating the work these engines could do with horses of the day etc. no two horses are the same ..you have to measure the work a horse can do ie force X distance and then divide it by time to give you an actual power figure ...
Jules
EDIT: Mechanical horsepower was eventually set to 33,000 foot-pounds per minute
There isnt a clear definition it harks back to the days of steam engines and equating the work these engines could do with horses of the day etc. no two horses are the same ..you have to measure the work a horse can do ie force X distance and then divide it by time to give you an actual power figure ...
Jules
EDIT: Mechanical horsepower was eventually set to 33,000 foot-pounds per minute
it's not that things are not as simple as they seem. it'sjust that things are not as literal as they seem.
A lot of units are named after those involved with developing their formulas and whatnot. It's not like James Watts is equivalent to 1 Watt or something.
A lot of units are named after those involved with developing their formulas and whatnot. It's not like James Watts is equivalent to 1 Watt or something.


