Since the topic all ready kinda came up that honda is copying suzuki kinda.
This is a prime example.
I Know that this is going to be a little one sided,
but what do you think? Which would you rather see in your garage?
http://blog.wired.com/cars/2007/09/honda-readies-s.html


Suzuki


http://www.cycleworld.com/article.as...article_id=298

 

The Honda has a much more sleeker/cleaner look, plus the one sided swing arm is a nice added bonus.

 

That Susuki is damn sexy, but I'll never be able to afford eithersokindaa pointless question for me.

 

B-King looks so damn agressive, i love it

 

neither...they are both crap. not even gonna vote

 

The Honda looks like it's sporting a V6. I wonder if they toned down the HP like most companies tend to do on naked style bikes. I know the B-King has not been toned down at all. It has the full power of the new Hayabusa engine, 170+HP. They both look good. So hard to decide.

 

It's the flat six from the Goldwing.

I like the undertail exhaust of the Suzuki, but I'd never buy anything but Honda.

 

Tough call. Definitely like the wheels, swingarm, and hugger better on the suzuki, but the honda has a nicer looking headlight and tail section. The honda engine looks odd. I think it's because it's too simplified. It actually looks like a model or something. As is, though, if I had to pick one (based on looks alone, of course), I would take the Suzuki.

 

I like the flat 6 and the curved lines a little more than the b-kings cuts. Also the suzuki is a little plastic looking. And finally WHERE DO THE BITCH SIT ON THE B-KING? 50% of owning a bike is about getting laid. Actually 50% of life is about getting laid.

 

"I Know that this is going to be a little one sided,
but what do you think? Which would you rather see in your garage? "
neither....,thats what i
want to see in my garage!