Gays in the military
Friend and Hero ...
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,596
Likes: 0
From: Worldwide not a joke
RE: Gays in the military
Yes it is amazing that the Air Force would use some funding to work on project like this. But actuality $7.5 million is not a hell of a lot of money out of their budget now is it
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,412
Likes: 0
From: Texas
RE: Gays in the military
Hell there's been tons of crazy military expirements and there will be tons more. Instead of calling it a "gay" bomb they should have called it a "hormone" bomb.
Remember Bat Bombs. An expirement to put a bunch of bats with napalm tied to them in containers then into a bomb. Once the plane reached altitude the bats would "hibernate" until they dropped them and then they would wake up and fly to "dark" places in a japanese target. Then the napalm would go off. The atom bomb beat them.
Remember Bat Bombs. An expirement to put a bunch of bats with napalm tied to them in containers then into a bomb. Once the plane reached altitude the bats would "hibernate" until they dropped them and then they would wake up and fly to "dark" places in a japanese target. Then the napalm would go off. The atom bomb beat them.
Redcoat, & Maxwell's Silver Hammer, MVN and curmudgeon
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 11,608
Likes: 5
From: Mud hut, Zululand
RE: Gays in the military
Truth to tell, the Japanese bombed the US long before US bombers could reach Japan - they used the jetstream, and ricepaper balloons with incendiaries tied to them......
Bat bombs ? consider what today's animal rights activists would say about that.............[X(]
+1 Samsfire.
Bat bombs ? consider what today's animal rights activists would say about that.............[X(]
+1 Samsfire.
Admin Emeritus & MVN
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 6,908
Likes: 3
From: Conyers, GA
RE: Gays in the military
ORIGINAL: rangerscott
I love it how people talk about gays as if they are a ****ing different kind of species. THEY'RE HUMAN ****ING BEINGS!!! The title should say, "Horses in the military" and the first post should be. How do you feel about horses being in the military and do you think they should be?
There that's a ****ing thread.
I love it how people talk about gays as if they are a ****ing different kind of species. THEY'RE HUMAN ****ING BEINGS!!! The title should say, "Horses in the military" and the first post should be. How do you feel about horses being in the military and do you think they should be?
There that's a ****ing thread.
Banned
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
RE: Gays in the military
ORIGINAL: HARDCORP 8654
Man I really don't feel like getting dragged into this ****, but I feel I must at least make some comment. So here it is. If the regulations need to be changed then change the damn regulations, but does anyone commenting here understand the mindset behind the first rules concerning this issue? Is this issue being brought to the forum floor, because of Congresswoman Baldwin's recent comments does anyone here understand the larger implication behind this type of regulation let's touch on one of them. Sexual misconduct has been an issue for the United States Military as far back as the 1st World War maybe even father than that. Should we discuss the alleged murder suicide Years ago, when the Navy claimed a gunnersmate intentionally blew up a gun turrent over an alleged homosexual triangle or should we discuss more mainstream. Things like operation Tailhook or the former U.S. Army's Top Sergeant alleged sexual misconduct or the most recent murder and abduction at Camp Lejeune there are broad ranging issues concerning regulations that often can't be looked at without taking the big picture into perspective. Or maybe should take this post, a little more lightheartedly and said hell the Air Force wants to make the entire opposition gay. But if you think that's a joke. I suggest you click on the link provided below.
I will end this post with one statement. There is absolutely no room in a warrior culture for anything other than platonic feelings. For those who surround you, we have already jeopardized and clouded that issue with the integration of both genders serving side by side. Human nature (heterosexual or homosexual) can not be overcome by those with weak willpower, and when you're dealing with a population of individuals whose ages range between 18 and 24, who operate with a reactionary mind and not a mind of forethought. You're absolutely asking for trouble... Yes, Change the God Damn Regulation, but Changing in the Right Manner and for the Right Reasons
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/offbe...vers_us_m.html
Man I really don't feel like getting dragged into this ****, but I feel I must at least make some comment. So here it is. If the regulations need to be changed then change the damn regulations, but does anyone commenting here understand the mindset behind the first rules concerning this issue? Is this issue being brought to the forum floor, because of Congresswoman Baldwin's recent comments does anyone here understand the larger implication behind this type of regulation let's touch on one of them. Sexual misconduct has been an issue for the United States Military as far back as the 1st World War maybe even father than that. Should we discuss the alleged murder suicide Years ago, when the Navy claimed a gunnersmate intentionally blew up a gun turrent over an alleged homosexual triangle or should we discuss more mainstream. Things like operation Tailhook or the former U.S. Army's Top Sergeant alleged sexual misconduct or the most recent murder and abduction at Camp Lejeune there are broad ranging issues concerning regulations that often can't be looked at without taking the big picture into perspective. Or maybe should take this post, a little more lightheartedly and said hell the Air Force wants to make the entire opposition gay. But if you think that's a joke. I suggest you click on the link provided below.
I will end this post with one statement. There is absolutely no room in a warrior culture for anything other than platonic feelings. For those who surround you, we have already jeopardized and clouded that issue with the integration of both genders serving side by side. Human nature (heterosexual or homosexual) can not be overcome by those with weak willpower, and when you're dealing with a population of individuals whose ages range between 18 and 24, who operate with a reactionary mind and not a mind of forethought. You're absolutely asking for trouble... Yes, Change the God Damn Regulation, but Changing in the Right Manner and for the Right Reasons
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/offbe...vers_us_m.html
Anybody else see the irony in this?
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,987
Likes: 0
From: El Paso Tx. U.S.A.
Friend and Hero ...
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,596
Likes: 0
From: Worldwide not a joke
RE: Gays in the military
[sm=badidea.gif]
[sm=wtf.gif]
Alright I've been up 30 plus hours maybe I'm blind, but I don't see the irony and maybe because I'm tired and feeling a little generous. AND Just in case I have misinterpreted your comments. Here is your opportunity to clarify the matter.
But if it's the sarcastic **** it looks like I'm going to give you 3 choices
First choice, you can man-up and clarify your comment and stand behind your ****ing whole statement or, choice number two. You can shut the **** up and set the hell down and or crawl back under BUSS. Last and final choice you can PM me about the whole matter
Hell it makes absolutely no difference to me make your decision
ORIGINAL: shoortbuss
Damn Hardcorp, your colorful use of fonts is a little fruity.
Anybody else see the irony in this?
ORIGINAL: HARDCORP 8654
Man I really don't feel like getting dragged into this ****, but I feel I must at least make some comment. So here it is. If the regulations need to be changed then change the damn regulations, but does anyone commenting here understand the mindset behind the first rules concerning this issue? Is this issue being brought to the forum floor, because of Congresswoman Baldwin's recent comments does anyone here understand the larger implication behind this type of regulation let's touch on one of them. Sexual misconduct has been an issue for the United States Military as far back as the 1st World War maybe even father than that. Should we discuss the alleged murder suicide Years ago, when the Navy claimed a gunnersmate intentionally blew up a gun turrent over an alleged homosexual triangle or should we discuss more mainstream. Things like operation Tailhook or the former U.S. Army's Top Sergeant alleged sexual misconduct or the most recent murder and abduction at Camp Lejeune there are broad ranging issues concerning regulations that often can't be looked at without taking the big picture into perspective. Or maybe should take this post, a little more lightheartedly and said hell the Air Force wants to make the entire opposition gay. But if you think that's a joke. I suggest you click on the link provided below.
I will end this post with one statement. There is absolutely no room in a warrior culture for anything other than platonic feelings. For those who surround you, we have already jeopardized and clouded that issue with the integration of both genders serving side by side. Human nature (heterosexual or homosexual) can not be overcome by those with weak willpower, and when you're dealing with a population of individuals whose ages range between 18 and 24, who operate with a reactionary mind and not a mind of forethought. You're absolutely asking for trouble... Yes, Change the God Damn Regulation, but Changing in the Right Manner and for the Right Reasons
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/offbe...vers_us_m.html
Man I really don't feel like getting dragged into this ****, but I feel I must at least make some comment. So here it is. If the regulations need to be changed then change the damn regulations, but does anyone commenting here understand the mindset behind the first rules concerning this issue? Is this issue being brought to the forum floor, because of Congresswoman Baldwin's recent comments does anyone here understand the larger implication behind this type of regulation let's touch on one of them. Sexual misconduct has been an issue for the United States Military as far back as the 1st World War maybe even father than that. Should we discuss the alleged murder suicide Years ago, when the Navy claimed a gunnersmate intentionally blew up a gun turrent over an alleged homosexual triangle or should we discuss more mainstream. Things like operation Tailhook or the former U.S. Army's Top Sergeant alleged sexual misconduct or the most recent murder and abduction at Camp Lejeune there are broad ranging issues concerning regulations that often can't be looked at without taking the big picture into perspective. Or maybe should take this post, a little more lightheartedly and said hell the Air Force wants to make the entire opposition gay. But if you think that's a joke. I suggest you click on the link provided below.
I will end this post with one statement. There is absolutely no room in a warrior culture for anything other than platonic feelings. For those who surround you, we have already jeopardized and clouded that issue with the integration of both genders serving side by side. Human nature (heterosexual or homosexual) can not be overcome by those with weak willpower, and when you're dealing with a population of individuals whose ages range between 18 and 24, who operate with a reactionary mind and not a mind of forethought. You're absolutely asking for trouble... Yes, Change the God Damn Regulation, but Changing in the Right Manner and for the Right Reasons
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/offbe...vers_us_m.html
Anybody else see the irony in this?
Alright I've been up 30 plus hours maybe I'm blind, but I don't see the irony and maybe because I'm tired and feeling a little generous. AND Just in case I have misinterpreted your comments. Here is your opportunity to clarify the matter.
But if it's the sarcastic **** it looks like I'm going to give you 3 choices
First choice, you can man-up and clarify your comment and stand behind your ****ing whole statement or, choice number two. You can shut the **** up and set the hell down and or crawl back under BUSS. Last and final choice you can PM me about the whole matter
Hell it makes absolutely no difference to me make your decision
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,099
Likes: 0
RE: Gays in the military
ORIGINAL: shoortbuss
Damn Hardcorp, your colorful use of fonts is a little fruity.
Anybody else see the irony in this?
ORIGINAL: HARDCORP 8654
Man I really don't feel like getting dragged into this ****, but I feel I must at least make some comment. So here it is. If the regulations need to be changed then change the damn regulations, but does anyone commenting here understand the mindset behind the first rules concerning this issue? Is this issue being brought to the forum floor, because of Congresswoman Baldwin's recent comments does anyone here understand the larger implication behind this type of regulation let's touch on one of them. Sexual misconduct has been an issue for the United States Military as far back as the 1st World War maybe even father than that. Should we discuss the alleged murder suicide Years ago, when the Navy claimed a gunnersmate intentionally blew up a gun turrent over an alleged homosexual triangle or should we discuss more mainstream. Things like operation Tailhook or the former U.S. Army's Top Sergeant alleged sexual misconduct or the most recent murder and abduction at Camp Lejeune there are broad ranging issues concerning regulations that often can't be looked at without taking the big picture into perspective. Or maybe should take this post, a little more lightheartedly and said hell the Air Force wants to make the entire opposition gay. But if you think that's a joke. I suggest you click on the link provided below.
I will end this post with one statement. There is absolutely no room in a warrior culture for anything other than platonic feelings. For those who surround you, we have already jeopardized and clouded that issue with the integration of both genders serving side by side. Human nature (heterosexual or homosexual) can not be overcome by those with weak willpower, and when you're dealing with a population of individuals whose ages range between 18 and 24, who operate with a reactionary mind and not a mind of forethought. You're absolutely asking for trouble... Yes, Change the God Damn Regulation, but Changing in the Right Manner and for the Right Reasons
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/offbe...vers_us_m.html
Man I really don't feel like getting dragged into this ****, but I feel I must at least make some comment. So here it is. If the regulations need to be changed then change the damn regulations, but does anyone commenting here understand the mindset behind the first rules concerning this issue? Is this issue being brought to the forum floor, because of Congresswoman Baldwin's recent comments does anyone here understand the larger implication behind this type of regulation let's touch on one of them. Sexual misconduct has been an issue for the United States Military as far back as the 1st World War maybe even father than that. Should we discuss the alleged murder suicide Years ago, when the Navy claimed a gunnersmate intentionally blew up a gun turrent over an alleged homosexual triangle or should we discuss more mainstream. Things like operation Tailhook or the former U.S. Army's Top Sergeant alleged sexual misconduct or the most recent murder and abduction at Camp Lejeune there are broad ranging issues concerning regulations that often can't be looked at without taking the big picture into perspective. Or maybe should take this post, a little more lightheartedly and said hell the Air Force wants to make the entire opposition gay. But if you think that's a joke. I suggest you click on the link provided below.
I will end this post with one statement. There is absolutely no room in a warrior culture for anything other than platonic feelings. For those who surround you, we have already jeopardized and clouded that issue with the integration of both genders serving side by side. Human nature (heterosexual or homosexual) can not be overcome by those with weak willpower, and when you're dealing with a population of individuals whose ages range between 18 and 24, who operate with a reactionary mind and not a mind of forethought. You're absolutely asking for trouble... Yes, Change the God Damn Regulation, but Changing in the Right Manner and for the Right Reasons
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/offbe...vers_us_m.html
Anybody else see the irony in this?
Redcoat, & Maxwell's Silver Hammer, MVN and curmudgeon
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 11,608
Likes: 5
From: Mud hut, Zululand
RE: Gays in the military
C'mon guys, let's try and be objective, huh ?
Flaming it won't improve the debate (although g-d knows we've been this road sooooooooooo many times.)
Flaming it won't improve the debate (although g-d knows we've been this road sooooooooooo many times.)