can some one explain to me whats the diffrence between the three why is a 900 not considered a superbike and the 600 are suppose to be for corners and 1000 for power and speed so would a 900 be in the middle

 

there are tons of differences. weight, frame design, engine design, hp/torque that the engine produces, subframes, swingarms, etc. yeah the 1000 are fast and the 600 are light, but hell the 954 is still lighter than the new 600rr and 1000rr. i was readin cycle world that did a review on all the new bikes out and the 954 is still the lightest. i cant tell u why 900's are not consideredsuper bikes but they are "open class liter bikes"

 

anything that aint a busa is gay and slow

 

^^^ That was random. I busa isnt even considered a "sportbike."

 

^^^ u postin that just made u king of gay get out of my post

 

I'm sure JZ was being sarcastic.

 

yea but some newbie with 11 posts wont understand JZ e-personality

 

i hate busas dude no lie and i sell them for a living they are the biggest pieces of crap on the planet thats why they totally redid it, i hate suzukis to be exact. ppl put them on a pedestal for just the fact that everyone says GIXXER, so thr 85% of ppl in the world who dont know **** about motorcycles only know gixxer which is why they all want them, same thing with busas

 

who said the 900s werent superbikes?
600s 750s (whene everyone made them) and the 900s up to the 1000s are all meant for the corners as you put it. they are (or were at one point) different engine classes in motorcycle roadracing.

 

dont listen to hassell dude he rides a vespa