Off Topic A place for you CBR junkies to boldly go off topic. Almost anything goes.

2009 Challenger SRT

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 05-22-2008, 10:49 PM
rons93rr's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: peabody ma 01960
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 2009 Challenger SRT

+1 mustangs do look better!!! to change my minde i would have to see it in person, the pictures look pretty good but i'm not in love w/it.
 
  #12  
Old 05-22-2008, 10:58 PM
rons93rr's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: peabody ma 01960
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 2009 Challenger SRT

well just thought i would add my new favoret car is neither, the new nissan GTR will absolutly whoop both their asses
no questions asked.. even though it is not a retro looking muscle car, it's the new muscle car to beat.
 
  #13  
Old 05-22-2008, 11:00 PM
rangerscott's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 2009 Challenger SRT

Yea. Another classic reborn cause auto makers have no creativity.
 
  #14  
Old 05-22-2008, 11:08 PM
TK954RR's Avatar
Jan 2009 ROTM
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,493
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 2009 Challenger SRT

The nissan is a good looking car, it however isnt the muscle car to beat.Its a 6cyl, no car with a 6 should have muscle in the title . Looks like its only 430hp, thats not really that big a deal.
 
  #15  
Old 05-23-2008, 12:01 AM
rons93rr's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: peabody ma 01960
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 2009 Challenger SRT

well for a 6 it's got 480hp to back it up to all 4 corners, whats you camaro pushing for that big 350???
hey, i usually don't even look at the japanese cars as muscle cars i'm a ford,chevey and even a dodge guybut how
can you not call this car a muscle car? this is the fastest production car in the world to date itbeat lambo, 911 turbo,
corvett z06, viper every thing w/a top speed of 192 mph for 65-75k beat that. you won't. sorry but i have to disagree.
 
  #16  
Old 05-23-2008, 12:13 AM
TK954RR's Avatar
Jan 2009 ROTM
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,493
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 2009 Challenger SRT

Again i wont argue its not good looking, or fast. I just cant call it a muscle car, and with a 75k price tag i would lean towards supercar for a title. As far as what my little 350 is pushing see below Bring the GTR and bring your wallet

 
  #17  
Old 05-23-2008, 12:19 AM
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location:
Posts: 732
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 2009 Challenger SRT


ORIGINAL: TK954RR

Again i wont argue its not good looking, or fast. I just cant call it a muscle car, and with a 75k price tag i would lean towards supercar for a title. As far as what my little 350 is pushing see below Bring the GTR and bring your wallet


You call those numbers? Please









JK, pics of the car since a piece of paper cant go 150mph.
 
  #18  
Old 05-23-2008, 12:29 AM
TK954RR's Avatar
Jan 2009 ROTM
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,493
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 2009 Challenger SRT

Piece of paper will go 150mph in the passenger seat I have posted pics in several threads, but i will put one or 2 here as i really dont want to jack this any worse than has already happened.



 
  #19  
Old 05-23-2008, 12:35 AM
rons93rr's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: peabody ma 01960
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 2009 Challenger SRT

wow i am impressed. but how much traction do you realy get to the ground pushing all that power? you probly can't use all that
power w/out breaking the tires. what's your quarter mile time 10's? and that would be a worked over car not off the showroom,
but still i am impressed very good numbers wish i had them. but if i had the gtr i would still take you up on your offer, just for ****s and giggles..
 
  #20  
Old 05-23-2008, 12:48 AM
TK954RR's Avatar
Jan 2009 ROTM
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,493
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 2009 Challenger SRT

Traction on street tires, first gear none, 2nd gear none, 3rd gear some LOL. I have not had a chance to track it yet, i recently get her done, had to redo a few things and have the charger worked over. I am sure it would go 10's easily as is, if i changed back the rear springs so i could run full slicks i think i could get a 9 out of her. That dyno run was really for sh*ts and giggles, that was making nearly 20lbs of boost and race fuel, not something i wanted to keep it setup as. After i ran the race fuel out, i changed back to a 12lb pulley and tuned it on 93 octane making a very reliable 580hp and 602 lbs of torque. I like to drive it a lot, so i wanted some reliabilty with it, and be able to keep very good street manners, which it does. Thanks for the complimets though Ron, and i do realize that we are comparing apples to oranges here, and your points were well taken on my end as well.
 


Quick Reply: 2009 Challenger SRT



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:54 PM.