F4i - Main Forum Main F4i discussion board

-1/+2 and 520 conversion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 16, 2008 | 07:24 PM
  #21  
HockeyFan's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Default RE: -1/+2 and 520 conversion

What's the difference between 520 and 525?...sorry, newbie question.
 
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2008 | 07:42 PM
  #22  
TBFGhost's Avatar
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
From: Hunterdon Cnty, NJ
Default RE: -1/+2 and 520 conversion

Chain size, the 525 is larger and stronger, it is what the F4i come stock with, how ever the 520 chains work as well and are claimed to be lighter and there for faster....in a simple way of explaining it.
 
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2008 | 07:56 PM
  #23  
HockeyFan's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Default RE: -1/+2 and 520 conversion

ORIGINAL: TBFGhost

Chain size, the 525 is larger and stronger, it is what the F4i come stock with, how ever the 520 chains work as well and are claimed to be lighter and there for faster....in a simple way of explaining it.
Thanks that helps. So, I assume that you'll still get the extra torque with the unspring weight...with -1+2 then, but still have some characteristics of being stock?
 
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2008 | 08:57 PM
  #24  
RooR Mast3r904's Avatar
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: -1/+2 and 520 conversion

a +1,-2 is off by 20% so it isnt a set mph
 
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2008 | 09:27 PM
  #25  
TBFGhost's Avatar
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
From: Hunterdon Cnty, NJ
Default RE: -1/+2 and 520 conversion

Yeah, you get the same ratio but the 520 chain is lighter....is it something most of us will notice on the street....i doubt it...maybe wear wise tho the 525 chain could last longer....but it is also a little more money so....had my bike not come with a 520 on it, I would have stuck with the 525
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2008 | 07:23 AM
  #26  
Todd84's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 332
Likes: 1
From: Marshall, MI
Default RE: -1/+2 and 520 conversion

I just got mine done this weekend. D.I.D. chain and driven sprokets from sprocket center. I couldn't push it hard the front brakes aren't done yet should be done today but it is awesome, makes a big difference. I went -1/+2 520. I am glad I did.
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2008 | 11:16 AM
  #27  
G3NESYS's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
From: East Central Indiana
Default RE: -1/+2 and 520 conversion

so if the speedo is off by 20% then the odometer would be off by 20% too, right?
which means im gettin alot less miles per tank than i thought... whcih sux. lol
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2008 | 11:56 AM
  #28  
xtremef4i's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
From: Tipp City, OH
Default RE: -1/+2 and 520 conversion

your MGP has to do with the increased RPMs after the gearing change. the % error on the speedo has nothing to do with it...cruising down the highway at 65ish the RPMs are only a few hundred higher...I dont think the change will dramatically affect miles per gallon...I personally ride my bike for fun with a heavy throttle. I do no commuting so this is not a concern to me
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2008 | 12:39 PM
  #29  
G3NESYS's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
From: East Central Indiana
Default RE: -1/+2 and 520 conversion

yea but if the speedo is off, thenwouldnt my odometer be off?

and if my odometer is off, then i really got less miles on my tank of gas than the odometer says. thats what i meant, i didnt mean the speedometer caused me to get less mpg i just meant that i got less miles than the odometer says
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2008 | 12:52 PM
  #30  
xtremef4i's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
From: Tipp City, OH
Default RE: -1/+2 and 520 conversion

my bad, I thought you meant miles per gallon...you are right, the odometer will rackup the miles faster than what you actually have, meaning it will seem that you get more miles to the tank than you actually do
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:05 PM.