CBR 954RR 2002 - 2003 - CBR 954RR Forum

dyno done today happy with results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 02-06-2009, 05:48 PM
skip954's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: south alabama
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default dyno done today happy with results

well i finnaly ran the 54 on the dyno and adjusted my pc i probably could have gotten more power but my air/fuel ratio was near perfect 12.5 -13 % across the board top out hp 130.22 @ 66 ft lbs of tourque. had a higher hp with another run 134 the power was real choppy at 4k and 5500 rppm now the power curve is greatkinda smooth till 5k then comes on like a horse.

mods

airbox,htev disabled, pipe ......pc3......... now mapped.....factory airfilter
 
  #2  
Old 02-06-2009, 05:51 PM
Hcstreetriding's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

nice! its insane to think about how fast these bikes are at 130 hp and the newer 1ks are coming out stock with so much more hp, i have never rode anything newer than an 04 but i would imagine that its ****in insane! if you feel like it, look up the other thread that was all dyno runs for the 54 and add your results to the list for more comparison
 
  #3  
Old 02-06-2009, 06:19 PM
skip954's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: south alabama
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Hcstreetriding
nice! its insane to think about how fast these bikes are at 130 hp and the newer 1ks are coming out stock with so much more hp, i have never rode anything newer than an 04 but i would imagine that its ****in insane! if you feel like it, look up the other thread that was all dyno runs for the 54 and add your results to the list for more comparison
is it in the 954 section or general i cant find anything scence they changed the forum
 
  #4  
Old 02-06-2009, 06:27 PM
Hcstreetriding's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

ah damn. it might have gotten lost in the switch, it was in teh 954 section, i cant remember the exact title of the thread.
 
  #5  
Old 02-06-2009, 06:37 PM
skip954's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: south alabama
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

i found a couple of them but not one that has a list O-well i think 130 is respectable ive seenbigger hp numbers mine topped at 134 and 70 ft lbs but like i said it was real choppy ill scan the sheet and post in a few at 130 it was smooth all the way...
 
  #6  
Old 02-06-2009, 07:06 PM
skip954's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: south alabama
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

i am posting the link instead of the sheet bcause it is so large had to make it big to be able to see the lines

http://i494.photobucket.com/albums/r.../dynofinal.jpg

http://i494.photobucket.com/albums/r...notophp001.jpg

look how smooth the power is on the final
 
  #7  
Old 02-06-2009, 08:34 PM
stunter411's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location:
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

noice but how come u done all that to the bike and only got 130hp???? i only got full akrapovic and pc3 and i got 145hp
 
  #8  
Old 02-06-2009, 09:04 PM
skip954's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: south alabama
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

the pipe i have is off of a 600 is a d&d slip on not full ex. still stock air filterand the bike was at 210 deg operating temp. if i ran it again first thing in the morn and at 150 temp it would be alot higher. the nuimbers sound low i know but the feeling of the bike is alot better it feels stronger than all the runs i made today. six in about an hour and i didnt hold it till the rev limiter either just redline. i think revlimiter kicks at 12500 rpm and i was still building hp at 11750 might have made better.

i guess what im trying to say is 130hp is nice 140 is better. i prefer the smoothness compared to what i had before.where it was choppy throttle up to 5500rpm
 
  #9  
Old 02-07-2009, 09:38 AM
Hcstreetriding's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

that looks nice, smoothed out a lot! 134 is not bad for you set up and running at 210 deg. i dont what a 600 slip on would do, probably make more back pressure which would probably lower your numbers too. get a BMC filter and a full exhaust and get it re mapped and i bet you would have some higher numbers.
 
  #10  
Old 02-11-2009, 10:17 AM
repsolroger's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: mount vernon wa
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

thats about what i had on mine.. but i just had a slip on and k@n air filter plus i ripped the guts out of my airbox. and mine had 131hp. but all dyno,s are a little different. i have a pcIII but it seems to keep losing its data and then my bike runs like poop. So i unplug it and go back to stock... it does run way better with the PCIII so it sucks when i have to redo the map for some wierd reason.
if you goto this link goto the 5 minute mark and you can see them dynoing my cbr 954 with repsol plastics.
http://tinypic.com/player.php?v=2ecznya&s=3
View My Video
you can also see my bike at the 11second mark
 


Quick Reply: dyno done today happy with results



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:23 AM.