diffrence between 600 900 1000?
#1
#3
RE: diffrence between 600 900 1000?
I guess it depends. For racing or a track day.....a 600 will be easier on your body to turn while on the gas and off for that matter because it weighs less and has less rotating mass (pistons, rods, crank, etc).
The 900RR weighs more than most new liter bikes by a little (maybe 10-12lbs) and makes roughly the same peak HP as a new 600 although it has more tourque than a 600 can even dream of having.
The 1000 is simply fast............but it does take more effort to turn it in than a 600. It will tire you out more trying to heave the extra 20lbs that it's carrying compared to a 600.
I thought of my 900 as a very torquey 600. Peak power is way down compared to any liter bike after 2000 and the weight is up, but it's still more than plenty for most riders. It's a superbike in my opinion. It sure as hell isn't a sport tourer. It's probably comparable to a ZX-9R. It's down on power compared to a Ninja, but still................it's not short on the thrill factor.
My wife's R6 is MUCH easier than my 1000 to throw down on through the tight bits...........a good rider on a 600 can show up an average rider on a 1000 as long as the road doesnt straighten out. Same with the 900, I passed MANY a ZX-10R, GSX-R1000, 954, 929, 1000RR at the track on mine, but I've also been passed by a GREAT rider on an SV-650 so........the rider makes a huge difference.
The 900RR weighs more than most new liter bikes by a little (maybe 10-12lbs) and makes roughly the same peak HP as a new 600 although it has more tourque than a 600 can even dream of having.
The 1000 is simply fast............but it does take more effort to turn it in than a 600. It will tire you out more trying to heave the extra 20lbs that it's carrying compared to a 600.
I thought of my 900 as a very torquey 600. Peak power is way down compared to any liter bike after 2000 and the weight is up, but it's still more than plenty for most riders. It's a superbike in my opinion. It sure as hell isn't a sport tourer. It's probably comparable to a ZX-9R. It's down on power compared to a Ninja, but still................it's not short on the thrill factor.
My wife's R6 is MUCH easier than my 1000 to throw down on through the tight bits...........a good rider on a 600 can show up an average rider on a 1000 as long as the road doesnt straighten out. Same with the 900, I passed MANY a ZX-10R, GSX-R1000, 954, 929, 1000RR at the track on mine, but I've also been passed by a GREAT rider on an SV-650 so........the rider makes a huge difference.
#4
RE: diffrence between 600 900 1000?
well in a straight line, my 98 900rr with Full D&D exhaust, stage 4 jets, -1+5 sprockets, +4 ignition advance, K&N filter, ran even with an '03 GSXR1000 with a few odds and ends done to it...... it could've been rider but we stayed even, with me even pulling him a lil in 3rd gear.....
#5
RE: diffrence between 600 900 1000?
well in a straight line, my 98 900rr with Full D&D exhaust, stage 4 jets, -1+5 sprockets, +4 ignition advance, K&N filter, ran even with an '03 GSXR1000 with a few odds and ends done to it...... it could've been rider but we stayed even, with me even pulling him a lil in 3rd gear.....
The 900 is not much of a match in flat out acceleration for any of the new 1000's given equal or similar rider weight and from a rollon to eliminate rider error.
#6
RE: diffrence between 600 900 1000?
Well, the 900 is considered a Superbike, because thats what Baba wanted to make. When the FireBlade first arrived, other Supersbikes was the ZX10, GSX-R1100 and CBR1000F.
But they weighed a tonne, the FireBlade was one of, if not the first, to combined lots of power with low weight.
Though not much compared to todays bikes, but back then, it was SPECIAL
But they weighed a tonne, the FireBlade was one of, if not the first, to combined lots of power with low weight.
Though not much compared to todays bikes, but back then, it was SPECIAL
#7
RE: diffrence between 600 900 1000?
I tell you what guys, after I finally got my 900 running the way I wanted to it has impressed me quite a bit. I especially like the torque that I get at a very low rpm. It really slips me *** back if I'm not holding on. My 900 is deffinently a keeper. Johnny
#8
RE: diffrence between 600 900 1000?
Just throw a Turbo on ya 900RR, get anyware from 270 - 310 hp i doubt anything could keep up with you after that...
But all in all im pretty happy with my 900RR i can easily keep up with todays bikes and show some ones up too.
As for me i dont think i need more power to add to it, its pretty dam fast already.
__________
93 900RR
Carbon Fiber Extras
D and D Full Exaust
Stage 2 Jet kit
520 RK Race chain
LindeMann Full Race suspention
But all in all im pretty happy with my 900RR i can easily keep up with todays bikes and show some ones up too.
As for me i dont think i need more power to add to it, its pretty dam fast already.
__________
93 900RR
Carbon Fiber Extras
D and D Full Exaust
Stage 2 Jet kit
520 RK Race chain
LindeMann Full Race suspention
#9
RE: diffrence between 600 900 1000?
Thosedays heavyweight superbikes been tagged to 900 whereby this days it is a litre. Its all depends with the manufacturer I guess. I won't be suprise they will come out with 800cc class since its a hit in motogp at present.
I agree fully with gixxereater that a performance of a bike is very much depends in the riders ability.
I agree fully with gixxereater that a performance of a bike is very much depends in the riders ability.