CBR 600F3 1995 - 1998 CBR 600F3 Forum

1995 F3 Tires- MAX SIZE?

Old Nov 1, 2011 | 08:51 PM
  #1  
fatluke_nofx's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
From: Hamilton Canada
Default 1995 F3 Tires- MAX SIZE?

I belive the 1995 CBR comes with a 160 rear- anyone ever size it up. I am going to, but what is the make safe size up, 180?? or greater??

Im gonna go to my local bike shop and see their opinion, but I want to see what you guys think first.
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2011 | 10:33 PM
  #2  
coalminer frank's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,143
Likes: 3
From: north/central WV
Default

Do a search, all kinds of talk on here about it. No. 180 is for at aleast 5.5 inch wheel. F2 is 4.5 inch. F3 is 5 inch. 160 is the recomended size for both. A bigger tire on smaller wheel actually squeezes the big tire . So its not really as big as it should be. Plus it distorts the profile. Which is bad. If its just a stunter, go for it. If its a track bike stick with the 160.
 
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2011 | 04:18 AM
  #3  
fatluke_nofx's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
From: Hamilton Canada
Default

not a trak bike at all, just a fun bike, a bit of highway ride for work and the rest in town and playin around. I still want to be able to corner well.... if a 4.5 takes 160, and a 5 takes 160 with a diff of .5inch, shouldnt a 5 also be able to take a 180 if the 5.5 takes 180?? Im pretty keen on gettin a fat tire on the back, but not if its gonna effect my cornering
 
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2011 | 02:18 PM
  #4  
spicymeowmix's Avatar
Official Welcome Crew Spicy Cat
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,655
Likes: 3
From: Auburn, AL
Default

Originally Posted by fatluke_nofx
not a trak bike at all, just a fun bike, a bit of highway ride for work and the rest in town and playin around. I still want to be able to corner well.... if a 4.5 takes 160, and a 5 takes 160 with a diff of .5inch, shouldnt a 5 also be able to take a 180 if the 5.5 takes 180?? Im pretty keen on gettin a fat tire on the back, but not if its gonna effect my cornering
there are so many posts of the consequences of putting a 180 on a rim designed to hold 170 max.
yes, it will hinder your cornering.
if you wanna do it, then do it
but keep in mind most of us dont recommend it unless you are only going 1 direction.
 
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2011 | 05:05 PM
  #5  
fatluke_nofx's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
From: Hamilton Canada
Default

ok, so i can hold a 160 stock, but can hold a 170 max... is it safe to put a 170 on it then, since it sounds as if the 180 is pretty dangerous....
 
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2011 | 05:28 PM
  #6  
MadHattr059's Avatar
Retired Super Moderator - At large E=MC2
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,299
Likes: 4
From: Tulsa,OK
Default

If I'm reading the post right, you are looking for a performance/handling gain by switching to a wider profile? If so, spend a little more on the tire's quality and stick with the stock size. If you aren't one of the 1%'ers, your stock bike is capable of more performance than you can take advantage of. It dang sure is for me! If you want to corner better, Practice! The weakest component to a modern motorcycle is the rider.

Unless you are very versed in motorcycle suspension/handling, leave that kind of modification for the race-track guys. Basically, an alter stock tires question is an evolution question, i.e. if you have to ask, you don't have the skill/knowledge, yet, to take advantage of any gains.

Ern
 
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2011 | 07:30 PM
  #7  
fatluke_nofx's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
From: Hamilton Canada
Default

thanks madhatter, thats good advice and I totally understand what you are saying. However I am doin serious mods to my bike this winter (just got it 2 weeks ago)

I will be posting my progress pics as soon as I get started (late december)

However I am after looks really, I want a wider rear wheel, I like the look, but I dont want to take a corner hard and spin out. Im after the fattest rear I can get, but still maintain a proper degree of safety. If I pop on a 170 everyone seems to say thats ok; that being said, is there any good brand recomendations of the fattest rear 170?
 
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2011 | 03:17 PM
  #8  
Timbostang's Avatar
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Default

My 96 f3 had a 180 on it when I bought it. I've put 1000miles on it so far and haven't had any troubles. I'm no track junky but I do lean pretty good in the twisties around my house and it seems to perform pretty well. You should be fine to go up to a 180.
 
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2011 | 08:29 PM
  #9  
fatluke_nofx's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
From: Hamilton Canada
Default

ok cool thanks timbostang... so many mixed answers, its confusing. But tim it sounds like you got what I want, and it sounds like you have no problems. I think i may do the 180, still i will ask my local mechanic and tire suplier.
 
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2011 | 07:57 AM
  #10  
notny41's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
From: St. Paul, MN
Default

I just bought a new Dunlop Qualifier 170/60ZR17 off ebay for $75 shipped for my F3. Look on ebay for seller called harleyoffortmeyers. (yeah, I know...harley...)
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:09 AM.