89 hurricane vs 96 cbr1000
#11
#12
#13
RE: 89 hurricane vs 96 cbr1000
ORIGINAL: R1000
Bad luck, 1992 are the fastest ones
ORIGINAL: slowpoke
And there was no 1992 1000F in the U.S. either.
ORIGINAL: chesthing
Honda didnt offer the 1989 year in the U.S., and I thought it ended in 1997 and the Blackbird was 1997-2003.
Honda didnt offer the 1989 year in the U.S., and I thought it ended in 1997 and the Blackbird was 1997-2003.
Bad luck, 1992 are the fastest ones
#14
RE: 89 hurricane vs 96 cbr1000
Yes your right, they where definitly competetive during the first years. My old CBR is although fast enough to envy many sport bike riders. Maybe, just maybe, I'll take it to GellerĂĄsen this sunday where Bike magazine subscribes are allowed to use the track. Havn't decided finally yet, but with the suspension retuned today, which was a great improvement and took away the understeer at corner entrance, I might change plans and take the thrusty old Honda. It's no competition anyway, just for pleasure (I almost beleived that myself...)
#15
RE: 89 hurricane vs 96 cbr1000
No Blackbird in U.S. after 2003.
ORIGINAL: skruvis
www.hoc.org.uk/gallery/press/1999/1999press.html
The CBR1000F 1999 press material..
http://www.hoc.org.uk/gallery/press/...9_CBR1000F.PDF
The Blackbird was from 1997 - And still going strong.
www.hoc.org.uk/gallery/press/1999/1999press.html
The CBR1000F 1999 press material..
http://www.hoc.org.uk/gallery/press/...9_CBR1000F.PDF
The Blackbird was from 1997 - And still going strong.
#16
#17
RE: 89 hurricane vs 96 cbr1000
ORIGINAL: R1000
Yes your right, they where definitly competetive during the first years. My old CBR is although fast enough to envy many sport bike riders. Maybe, just maybe, I'll take it to GellerĂĄsen this sunday where Bike magazine subscribes are allowed to use the track. Havn't decided finally yet, but with the suspension retuned today, which was a great improvement and took away the understeer at corner entrance, I might change plans and take the thrusty old Honda. It's no competition anyway, just for pleasure (I almost beleived that myself...)
Yes your right, they where definitly competetive during the first years. My old CBR is although fast enough to envy many sport bike riders. Maybe, just maybe, I'll take it to GellerĂĄsen this sunday where Bike magazine subscribes are allowed to use the track. Havn't decided finally yet, but with the suspension retuned today, which was a great improvement and took away the understeer at corner entrance, I might change plans and take the thrusty old Honda. It's no competition anyway, just for pleasure (I almost beleived that myself...)
ORIGINAL: chesthing
No Blackbird in U.S. after 2003.
No Blackbird in U.S. after 2003.
ORIGINAL: skruvis
www.hoc.org.uk/gallery/press/1999/1999press.html
The CBR1000F 1999 press material..
http://www.hoc.org.uk/gallery/press/...9_CBR1000F.PDF
The Blackbird was from 1997 - And still going strong.
www.hoc.org.uk/gallery/press/1999/1999press.html
The CBR1000F 1999 press material..
http://www.hoc.org.uk/gallery/press/...9_CBR1000F.PDF
The Blackbird was from 1997 - And still going strong.
http://www.hondamc.com/homc/template...l____2783.aspx
#18
RE: 89 hurricane vs 96 cbr1000
"Hehe.. I got a friend with an YZFR1000 Thunderace -98 and he has problem trying to outrun me in the topspeed.. and that is strange I can´t get over 265km/h."
There is almost always a faster gear to activate....BTW, the old CBR should indicate about 280 km/h top speed, that would be a real speed at 255 km/h according to my GPS. The missing 15 km/h on your bike could be caused by a slipping clutch.
#19
RE: 89 hurricane vs 96 cbr1000
ORIGINAL: R1000
"Hehe.. I got a friend with an YZFR1000 Thunderace -98 and he has problem trying to outrun me in the topspeed.. and that is strange I can´t get over 265km/h."
There is almost always a faster gear to activate....BTW, the old CBR should indicate about 280 km/h top speed, that would be a real speed at 255 km/h according to my GPS. The missing 15 km/h on your bike could be caused by a slipping clutch.
"Hehe.. I got a friend with an YZFR1000 Thunderace -98 and he has problem trying to outrun me in the topspeed.. and that is strange I can´t get over 265km/h."
There is almost always a faster gear to activate....BTW, the old CBR should indicate about 280 km/h top speed, that would be a real speed at 255 km/h according to my GPS. The missing 15 km/h on your bike could be caused by a slipping clutch.
Yeaa.. the clutch .. he is doing 265km/h@10500rpm .. slipping clutch then?
#20
RE: 89 hurricane vs 96 cbr1000
ORIGINAL: skruvis
Yeaa.. the clutch .. he is doing 265km/h@10500rpm .. slipping clutch then?
ORIGINAL: R1000
"Hehe.. I got a friend with an YZFR1000 Thunderace -98 and he has problem trying to outrun me in the topspeed.. and that is strange I can´t get over 265km/h."
There is almost always a faster gear to activate....BTW, the old CBR should indicate about 280 km/h top speed, that would be a real speed at 255 km/h according to my GPS. The missing 15 km/h on your bike could be caused by a slipping clutch.
"Hehe.. I got a friend with an YZFR1000 Thunderace -98 and he has problem trying to outrun me in the topspeed.. and that is strange I can´t get over 265km/h."
There is almost always a faster gear to activate....BTW, the old CBR should indicate about 280 km/h top speed, that would be a real speed at 255 km/h according to my GPS. The missing 15 km/h on your bike could be caused by a slipping clutch.
Yeaa.. the clutch .. he is doing 265km/h@10500rpm .. slipping clutch then?
To be able to tell more for sure about your bike, the following is needed:
- Speed reading calibrated by GPS, or if you can estimate the misreading some other way.
- Be sure that the rpm gauge reads correct. Even cheap digital engine diagnose instruments, like Biltema stuff, often has a built in rpm meter which normally is quite accurate since it just count pulses and not converts from pulses to a analogue reading like the stock meter. I beleive that the CBR rpm gauge reading is fairly OK, so you can probably skip the calibration if you have the same impression about your rpm gauge. To be real sure, you need to calibrate.
- The gearing, does it has stock 17/43 gearing (I belive that is was it should be on your bike) or something else?
- The rear tyre dimension and profile
After getting the data above, you can calculate what the top speed with your gearing and tyres should be at 10500 rpm and compare with the calibrated achieved top speed and see if there was a clutch slip. Trips from Australia posted a very useful Excel based gear/speed calculator in another thread earlier. See https://cbrforum.com/m_56038/tm.htm