CBR 1000F "Hurricane" 1987-1996 CBR 1000F

89 hurricane vs 96 cbr1000

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 07-21-2006, 03:30 PM
slowpoke's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 89 hurricane vs 96 cbr1000


ORIGINAL: chesthing

Honda didnt offer the 1989 year in the U.S., and I thought it ended in 1997 and the Blackbird was 1997-2003.
And there was no 1992 1000F in the U.S. either.
 
  #12  
Old 07-21-2006, 03:49 PM
R1000's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 89 hurricane vs 96 cbr1000



ORIGINAL: slowpoke


ORIGINAL: chesthing

Honda didnt offer the 1989 year in the U.S., and I thought it ended in 1997 and the Blackbird was 1997-2003.
And there was no 1992 1000F in the U.S. either.

Bad luck, 1992 are the fastest ones
 
  #13  
Old 07-21-2006, 04:04 PM
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lund (South Sweden)
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 89 hurricane vs 96 cbr1000


ORIGINAL: R1000



ORIGINAL: slowpoke


ORIGINAL: chesthing

Honda didnt offer the 1989 year in the U.S., and I thought it ended in 1997 and the Blackbird was 1997-2003.
And there was no 1992 1000F in the U.S. either.

Bad luck, 1992 are the fastest ones
Hmm i believed that the -87-88 was the fastest one?
 
  #14  
Old 07-21-2006, 04:59 PM
R1000's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 89 hurricane vs 96 cbr1000

Yes your right, they where definitly competetive during the first years. My old CBR is although fast enough to envy many sport bike riders. Maybe, just maybe, I'll take it to GellerĂĄsen this sunday where Bike magazine subscribes are allowed to use the track. Havn't decided finally yet, but with the suspension retuned today, which was a great improvement and took away the understeer at corner entrance, I might change plans and take the thrusty old Honda. It's no competition anyway, just for pleasure (I almost beleived that myself...)
 
  #15  
Old 07-21-2006, 05:14 PM
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: castle rock, co
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 89 hurricane vs 96 cbr1000

No Blackbird in U.S. after 2003.

ORIGINAL: skruvis

www.hoc.org.uk/gallery/press/1999/1999press.html

The CBR1000F 1999 press material..
http://www.hoc.org.uk/gallery/press/...9_CBR1000F.PDF


The Blackbird was from 1997 - And still going strong.
 
  #16  
Old 07-21-2006, 05:21 PM
CBR1000Farmer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 89 hurricane vs 96 cbr1000

Mine was the 87-88 type, but I thought the title stated 89 - doesn't matter it was the original hurricane with the 140 rear tire.

thanks, Pat
 
  #17  
Old 07-21-2006, 05:55 PM
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lund (South Sweden)
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 89 hurricane vs 96 cbr1000

ORIGINAL: R1000

Yes your right, they where definitly competetive during the first years. My old CBR is although fast enough to envy many sport bike riders. Maybe, just maybe, I'll take it to GellerĂĄsen this sunday where Bike magazine subscribes are allowed to use the track. Havn't decided finally yet, but with the suspension retuned today, which was a great improvement and took away the understeer at corner entrance, I might change plans and take the thrusty old Honda. It's no competition anyway, just for pleasure (I almost beleived that myself...)
Hehe.. I got a friend with an YZFR1000 Thunderace -98 and he has problem trying to outrun me in the topspeed.. and that is strange I can´t get over 265km/h.



ORIGINAL: chesthing

No Blackbird in U.S. after 2003.

ORIGINAL: skruvis

www.hoc.org.uk/gallery/press/1999/1999press.html

The CBR1000F 1999 press material..
http://www.hoc.org.uk/gallery/press/...9_CBR1000F.PDF


The Blackbird was from 1997 - And still going strong.
Ok... strange behaving by Honda I think.
http://www.hondamc.com/homc/template...l____2783.aspx
 
  #18  
Old 07-21-2006, 07:27 PM
R1000's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 89 hurricane vs 96 cbr1000


"Hehe.. I got a friend with an YZFR1000 Thunderace -98 and he has problem trying to outrun me in the topspeed.. and that is strange I can´t get over 265km/h."


There is almost always a faster gear to activate....BTW, the old CBR should indicate about 280 km/h top speed, that would be a real speed at 255 km/h according to my GPS. The missing 15 km/h on your bike could be caused by a slipping clutch.
 
  #19  
Old 07-21-2006, 08:40 PM
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lund (South Sweden)
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 89 hurricane vs 96 cbr1000


ORIGINAL: R1000


"Hehe.. I got a friend with an YZFR1000 Thunderace -98 and he has problem trying to outrun me in the topspeed.. and that is strange I can´t get over 265km/h."


There is almost always a faster gear to activate....BTW, the old CBR should indicate about 280 km/h top speed, that would be a real speed at 255 km/h according to my GPS. The missing 15 km/h on your bike could be caused by a slipping clutch.

Yeaa.. the clutch .. he is doing 265km/h@10500rpm .. slipping clutch then?
 
  #20  
Old 07-22-2006, 05:31 AM
R1000's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 89 hurricane vs 96 cbr1000


ORIGINAL: skruvis


ORIGINAL: R1000


"Hehe.. I got a friend with an YZFR1000 Thunderace -98 and he has problem trying to outrun me in the topspeed.. and that is strange I can´t get over 265km/h."


There is almost always a faster gear to activate....BTW, the old CBR should indicate about 280 km/h top speed, that would be a real speed at 255 km/h according to my GPS. The missing 15 km/h on your bike could be caused by a slipping clutch.

Yeaa.. the clutch .. he is doing 265km/h@10500rpm .. slipping clutch then?
If the reading is 265@10500 on the gauges it could be that the clutchs slips but I can not say for sure, some work has to be done first. The wind resistance is very high at those speeds, so a weak clutch could be slipping. My bike shows 280 km/h on the speedo when it runs 255 km/h according to GPS. It would go a few km's faster since it was still increasing speed slowly, but I had to slow down due to bumps on the road.

To be able to tell more for sure about your bike, the following is needed:

- Speed reading calibrated by GPS, or if you can estimate the misreading some other way.
- Be sure that the rpm gauge reads correct. Even cheap digital engine diagnose instruments, like Biltema stuff, often has a built in rpm meter which normally is quite accurate since it just count pulses and not converts from pulses to a analogue reading like the stock meter. I beleive that the CBR rpm gauge reading is fairly OK, so you can probably skip the calibration if you have the same impression about your rpm gauge. To be real sure, you need to calibrate.
- The gearing, does it has stock 17/43 gearing (I belive that is was it should be on your bike) or something else?
- The rear tyre dimension and profile

After getting the data above, you can calculate what the top speed with your gearing and tyres should be at 10500 rpm and compare with the calibrated achieved top speed and see if there was a clutch slip. Trips from Australia posted a very useful Excel based gear/speed calculator in another thread earlier. See https://cbrforum.com/m_56038/tm.htm





 


Quick Reply: 89 hurricane vs 96 cbr1000



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:08 AM.