CBR 1000F "Hurricane" 1987-1996 CBR 1000F

1990 cbr1000f engine swap issue/question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 3, 2012 | 07:10 PM
  #1  
TheRoachKing's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: CT
Default 1990 cbr1000f engine swap issue/question

I have replaced my 1990 CBR 10000f motor with a 1991 motor and find the new motor dose not have a inlet for the small hose coming from the water pump going to the cylinder head ( the "90" had a nipple between cylinder #1 and #2 but the "91" dose not ). I have no idea what to do with the hose! I have looked all over but don't see were it would go ...any help would be welcome
 

Last edited by Sprock; Sep 3, 2012 at 08:19 PM. Reason: newcomer needs question in proper section
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2012 | 09:18 PM
  #2  
hawkwind's Avatar
September 2009 ROTM Winner - Faster than a Speeding ..........
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,808
Likes: 3
From: UK
Default

The two motors should be identical, have you taken a look at the parts fiche?

Here's a link :- Fast shipping. Up to 40% off Honda, Yamaha, Kawasaki, Suzuki and Polaris OEM motorcycle parts and accessories. Deep reseller discounts.
 
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2012 | 09:40 PM
  #3  
Shadow's Avatar
Redcoat, & Maxwell's Silver Hammer, MVN and curmudgeon
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 11,608
Likes: 5
From: Mud hut, Zululand
Default

The 89, 90 and 91 engines are identical as Hawk says

Sounds like that 91 engine could be an 88 engine ?
 
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2012 | 11:18 AM
  #4  
TheRoachKing's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: CT
Default hopelessly lost due to incompetence

Well I pulled the engine VIN and ran it at the local shop they said it was a CBR 1000f 1991 engine. I have looked at the microfiche and it was not much help as far as were the line goes. the new engine just dose not seem to have this inlet nipple. I will keep looking for a answer.

Thank you all for your help
 
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2012 | 01:49 PM
  #5  
CBR1988's Avatar
Senior Member & Lord of the Odometer (300,000 Mles) & Counting
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
From: Rebel Cave in the Carolinas
Default

Hey:

Can you take a pic of both and post them on here?

Maybe have a mod help you?

Dub
 
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2012 | 07:50 AM
  #6  
TheRoachKing's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: CT
Default Pic's of old CBR 1000f "90" and "91" water pump and cyl head

Here is a link to some pic's of the new and old engine focusing on the water pump and cylinder head area of the engine

https://www.facebook.com/medi
/set/?set=a.4020202396340.153417.1619826283&type=3

if you can see them I will upload them to this form
Please advise
 
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2012 | 10:47 AM
  #7  
Sprock's Avatar
Administrator, MVN / ROTM NOV 2012
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 11,003
Likes: 3
From: Republic of Boon Island
Default

Pic link in FB no worky
 
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2012 | 12:27 PM
  #8  
TimBucTwo's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,237
Likes: 15
From: Bir Tawil
Default

^+1
No worky, is quirky!
 
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2012 | 03:42 PM
  #9  
TheRoachKing's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: CT
Default 1990 & 1991 CBR Pictures of Water Pumps




Image of 1990 CBR Water Pump (note nipple). It appears to be exactly the same as the 1991 CBR Water Pump.





View of 1991 CBR 1000 replacement motor. VIN confirms this is a 1991


1990 CBR 1000 motor head--note nipple where waterline from water pump used to attach.


1991 CBR 1000 left side view of cylinder head--note absence of nipple


1991 CBR 1000 right side view cylinder head--still no nipple

Any help in solving this mystery is greatly appreciated!! If anyone has any ideas please let me know.



 
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2012 | 11:40 AM
  #10  
TimBucTwo's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,237
Likes: 15
From: Bir Tawil
Default

That's interesting. The micro fiche shows the same water pump part # for both years. Also, both years have the same head #. There are 2 head #'s listed for both years but they're the same ones.

Don't know why the one head is missing the tube. My '93-'96 shop manual shows both tubes coming off the pump and head but doesn't mention them. It shows the hose connection between them however.

My guess is that its there to bleed off cavitation. I don't think any harm would be done plugging the hose coming off the pump.

or switch heads.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:59 PM.